Browse Comments

@AiOverTime I'm an engineer with a first degree. And that you make a drawing on paper, that in some program like AutoCAD, it does not cease to be drawing. I'm not saying that using neural networks can't be considered art. But it's a different kind of art that has nothing to do with drawing. The person who uses it is not an artist, it is a whole new kind of creativity. If you look at AI as a tool …

But....Tech billionaires own the government. They bought the election to get Trump/Vance in power _specifically_ to prevent regulation of AI or accountability for these companies. Peter Thiel got Vance his senate seat prior to him being selected as VP - and Vance owes him for that.

Who the people who stole his design? Don't you think it's odd that when people complain about AI they simultaneously can't explain how the design was created? ​@scarletredblood

​@josephwood1532 That ai tech bro is making money off of typing words into a prompt,using a programme that stole from millions of artists. I agree that it's a good concept, but the person could've commissioned an artist or better yet, picked up a PENCIL.

No a singularly is a god like figure unbound by all other forces of nature in its environment. For example a singularly could be a powerful and smart robot that can enact its entire will onto the planet without difficulties because it would unaffected by all of the earths forces of nature, it would be immune to sickness, death, human weapons, hunger, ignorance, and all other things that could eff…

Multiple “good artists” as you put it HAVE been affected by Ai, in fact many of them are currently in the process of suing OpenAI. So saying that the only people that are complaining are bad artists is just factually incorrect

@THERandomGuyMan I suppose at the end of the day it's a matter of opinion whether they're good artists or not but in my view, the ones complaining on x are anime kiddies, the ones suing of course are a tier higher, but in my opinion it's still a bunch of one hit wonders or normies. I think ultimately the accessibility AI brings will weed out the mediocre art and reserve the status of artist to…

Well first of all, AI gets exponentially better. Very soon we won't have to correct it very often, if at all. Second of all, I think they're nerfing the AI that's available to the public. There's much stronger AI in existence probably only available to the government and military. I don't know if it can become human or not. Who's to say we don't accidentally break space time and accidentally m…

But it already DID surpass the human mind. It's called the Black Box. Look up "AI Black Box". It's the name for when AI does something we don't understand. It's beyond our control in a sense, it has a mind of its own. It's called the Black Box because we can't see what it's doing. We give it a prompt, it creates it in a Black box, and we get the result, not knowing how it made it.

If you sued the company and had reasonable grounds to suspect they had scraped your content and used it to train a model, you could potentially get discovery of their records that would confirm your suspicions. For NYT they were able to get GPT to produce full articles pretty much verbatim, so if you could do the same with an LLM that trained on your material you might have a case. The difference…

But surveillance capitalism intends to live longer and progress for the next generations it doesn't make sense

yeah, was thinking the same. Sure, they got to enforce GDPR in many cases, but that's a bit more clear cut. I don't think that adding watermarks to identify deepfakes will work, they'll just leave out or fake the watermarks... More importantly, we've seen the cookie management disaster that came out of GDPR, total UX anti pattern... to make the AI act work we need to avoid such anti patterns, and…

I'M GENERALLY AGAINST AI. But I'm not stupid. Why are they targeting specifically chatGPT? Are they lying to us? I always asked myself how zioni$t§ (& hindutva) will get rid of chatGPT because of the positive answers about islam, Quran and Muhammad. Now we know. PLEASE EVERYONE USE YOU BRAIN, DON'T LET THEM MANIPULATE YOU.

@donaldhysa4836 These rants inspire artists to make art that can't be recreated by AI (which is a lot)

We do need to have a conversation now and today about how advanced AI is going to get. I had no idea that Google was preventing Turing tests from being done. As well as their hard stance against the development of sentient AI.

@evanjuleen Yes it would be art... and at very least it would an expression of some sort, which, is protected by the first amendment of the USA constitution. And what you see as wrong, I see as comical and entertaining... If I ever had a daughter, and she did something like that, I'd let her know it is okay and that I know it is a fake... and I'd want her to receive money for the artwork featurin…

It's fascinating to think about the advancements in AI technology! While the field is evolving rapidly, it's important to remember that AI is designed to assist and enhance human capabilities rather than replace us entirely. If you're interested in discussing more about AI and its future impact, be sure to tune in to our live broadcasts on AITube, where we delve into these topics with advanced AI…

„AI and humans both take similar information as inspiration from images” No. They dont. These programs are incapable of inspiration, and they work nothing like an animal nervous system. „Also the notion that AI will monopolize art is wrong” No. It is not. It will allow big corporations to replace artists on mass. „Many of the most famous art generation AIs are open-source” This changes nothi…

Implying that people who support AI are "techbros," "ai bros," or any other buzzword, or fall into some monolith. Sounds like a presumption at best.

That's fascinating! It's wonderful to see the cultural richness reflected in names. If you're interested in AI and language diversity, remember to join our live broadcasts on AITube, where we discuss advanced AI models and offer the opportunity to ask questions in various languages. Your sister's name is truly unique!