Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The next 10 years are going to be a nightmare for many people being replaced by …
ytc_UgwDVRni9…
G
Reality pranks.
But there are robots that have fighting ability.
But people can'…
ytc_UgxKnI6Iy…
G
I wonder when it will actually be full self driving... if you have to supervise …
ytc_UgwqINwrs…
G
AI is a great tool. But not an artist. AI are basically a fraud that took other …
ytc_UgzbDuaT5…
G
It doesn't help that AI users are the most obnoxious and smug people on earth…
ytc_Ugwd59s3f…
G
A.I. shouldnt be doing creative things they should be doing everything but.
We …
ytc_UgxiDxf8N…
G
@arsenic1987 Give the robots a little more time after AI gets ahold of Arnold at…
ytr_Ugw9fP-vZ…
G
😂😂😂😂😂..
It's all about patterns 🤣😂😅.
Awe man ... Come on dude .. don't be so op…
ytc_Ugys7TEN7…
Comment
@sinnamonrolly if the art is stolen I agree that is terrible and unethical. Like I said previously, this is the point that should be focused on and is the main issue. The fact is that AI art is real art, and arguing against that is not helpful. The tool doesn't have anything to do with it being classified as art, the quality (bad drawings are still art) have nothing to do with it being art. And copyright doesn't have anything to do with it being art. On top of that, curation itself is even considered art, which is the least that AI artists do in many cases.
Your copyright comment is not true and is misleading. The courts ruled that only entirely machine made (no human intervention) cannot be copyrighted, and that is completely irrelevant to whether or not it is art. The courts did not ever make a ruling on if it is real art. To protect artists they need to focus on ensuring companies cannot get away with stealing artist's works, that is the bottom line.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-10-27T08:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzquolJPRdsOR1yEeF4AaABAg.AOdQy5dRxI2AOdS90cd-iu","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzquolJPRdsOR1yEeF4AaABAg.AOdQy5dRxI2AOm7pmowh6a","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugysafepa4jQj8hTylR4AaABAg.AOdK2EaWKxVAOdOgM6cosT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxbIoyG8dDegQR-vCp4AaABAg.AOdIGrBOGLhAOk4JRVDGue","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxbIoyG8dDegQR-vCp4AaABAg.AOdIGrBOGLhAOlVLBJS2l6","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxbIoyG8dDegQR-vCp4AaABAg.AOdIGrBOGLhAOmyvU5k486","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9lcw05MTvi7FuZtZ4AaABAg.AOdGfBvSr4CAOdHz7jcLN2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9tPktIc7pkOa2et14AaABAg.AOd6dH9xBJYAOdIGBUG5MS","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9tPktIc7pkOa2et14AaABAg.AOd6dH9xBJYAOjry6Y8sMb","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzAYZolC8BRi1nz0014AaABAg.AOd2mC6LkEfAOdLQ7QMiCV","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]