Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G It is the sadness that permeates all of these AI experts that I find so scary. T… ytc_Ugy-cTn_0… G Juggalo makeup? I'm pretty certain any type of 'odd' color makeup would render f… rdc_etejgjl G I hate the idea of AI art, probably because I'm a traditional artist that has ju… ytc_Ugx8a2Urg… G Watching from Ukraine. I love how Simon listens, Very intently. And yes, AI and … ytc_UgxEbi7j6… G Why would you even want AI to make art, anyway? The promise of automation was th… ytc_Ugw_PaEvX… G I do think it's important to note that just like any technology, AI is a tool. I… ytc_UgzZom4xQ… G So do you mean that people should learn the fundamental concepts but then use AI… ytc_UgxHvCA5H… G Often a distinction isn't made when talking about AI. For example all lawyers ha… ytc_UgxtQmFa6…

Comment

@_B_E In order for something to qualify for copyright it must be an original work of human authorship fixed in a tangible medium. AI slop fails, at a minimum on the second requirement: AI isn't human. The first test, originality can also be reasonably considered absent. Because AI memory doesn't work even remotely like human memory. The trademark office issues trademarks that are trivially obviously fraudulent all the time. The patent office is even worse, as far too many patents are in the category of "thing already known on another device", eg: "Thing already well known from smartphones on a smartwatch or tablet". Which in turn was a follow-on from "thing already well known on the internet on a smartphone", which in turn were often "thing already well known in computers, but on the internet" -- actual inventions are, rather simply, quite a bit sparser than the patent office would lead you to believe. Fraudulent patents, fraudulent trademarks, and of course, fraudulent copyrights exist.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-09-01T18:1… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXeFxrd0QO","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXxGIBbVAr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMY0_4qD725","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwpo11gczMLoTPeIf54AaABAg.AMWc5q6TKYeAMnKTRd9Vjp","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyKav5L7CcVDe_FXf94AaABAg.AMWM-y7dIhwAMnKlDE6JZR","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMZUSp5FKht","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMoN6N4z_gT","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMXfff1vtCz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMY2bhqj--K","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMYNL0d-MYU","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses