Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I am going to be completely honest here, I am scared for the future. My primary …
ytc_Ugzr1PQSy…
G
Dear Bernie, I wish you could live forever! Once they get rid of all workers, wh…
ytc_Ugz8orI19…
G
“Yes Sarah. We’re aware of your 10M+ Chats with a Gojo Chatbot containing, but n…
ytc_UgxYFkPjs…
G
The AI art looks way better than the originals. I know people have a hate boner …
ytc_UgwcAx6iy…
G
Feel like the latest version of chatGPT is top notch, the DALL-E image generatio…
ytc_UgxjRMsaP…
G
I’ve seen the use of AI in the work place first hand. To the untrained unprofess…
ytc_UgwmkP0Oj…
G
“you can’t deepfake a video of me getting fucked!” “but you posted a picture of …
ytr_UgywW4Vxl…
G
2 thing i read recently that show our dystopian future. 1 San Francisco had a ro…
ytc_UgxB-No57…
Comment
@_B_E In order for something to qualify for copyright it must be an original work of human authorship fixed in a tangible medium. AI slop fails, at a minimum on the second requirement: AI isn't human.
The first test, originality can also be reasonably considered absent. Because AI memory doesn't work even remotely like human memory.
The trademark office issues trademarks that are trivially obviously fraudulent all the time.
The patent office is even worse, as far too many patents are in the category of "thing already known on another device", eg: "Thing already well known from smartphones on a smartwatch or tablet". Which in turn was a follow-on from "thing already well known on the internet on a smartphone", which in turn were often "thing already well known in computers, but on the internet" -- actual inventions are, rather simply, quite a bit sparser than the patent office would lead you to believe.
Fraudulent patents, fraudulent trademarks, and of course, fraudulent copyrights exist.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-01T18:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXeFxrd0QO","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXxGIBbVAr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMY0_4qD725","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwpo11gczMLoTPeIf54AaABAg.AMWc5q6TKYeAMnKTRd9Vjp","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyKav5L7CcVDe_FXf94AaABAg.AMWM-y7dIhwAMnKlDE6JZR","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMZUSp5FKht","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMoN6N4z_gT","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMXfff1vtCz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMY2bhqj--K","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMYNL0d-MYU","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]