Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@triplezee7589 I'm not dismissing artists of lower skill, but they need to be to…
ytr_UgywwJRt9…
G
Self driving cars should not be street legal in any state if you ask me. Unless …
ytc_UgynZwmPH…
G
I'm committing tons of code 100% written from AI very well written and especiall…
ytc_UgyHshBqF…
G
imagine : ?: this is 911? AI: YES ?: i need emergency help AI : sorry, i don't u…
ytc_UgwW9fzmo…
G
I guess you scientist will never learn! You’ve already had to shut AI down becau…
ytc_Ugw0Q-eeM…
G
Grok has done that … it generally got upset with me when it thought I compared i…
ytc_UgyzvhhSG…
G
Its mind boggling how definitions of the obvious are just smothered over with se…
ytc_UgxqP6yWx…
G
Adjacent plots (starting from 20 or so) can receive 'minimal infrastructure' lik…
rdc_d2x9nnq
Comment
Disagree. The actual problem is that people keep wanting to approach this from a legal/illegal point of view. That's a losing argument. Deepfakes should NOT be illegal. It's literally not the person. It's literally not non-consensual porn. It is a fake. We have had fake porn since the internet, and before. Only difference is it's more realistic and easier to make.
The answer is making it easier to sue creators of such content and remove such content from the internet. Personally, if such content required a disclaimer stating it is a parody, not real, just like how cartoons, ect, do when they have a character based on a real person appear on them, that is enough.
Once again. It's art. Not real.
Legislating it as thought it is a real nude lessens the impact of real non-consensual porn, and it completely opens freedom of artistic expression up to massive censorship. It's also not practical. Requiring disclaimers and tools to bring civil suite is both practical, already partially exists, and it protects freedom of artistic expression.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2023-05-22T01:0…
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzVw1CiP9l","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzYiIG9z-B","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKEvIo0Ybp81UcRed4AaABAg.9pzRvfPdcSJ9pzfi_waVSP","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY_MpVgjktRfuENgR4AaABAg.9pzR5c7SZ5s9pzRe1Fbpnv","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV1iuCVbiUArKqcvx4AaABAg.9pzQcGlt9fe9q-TPa03v6f","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9pzr0dRxs_K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9q-CBnOoDbd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzTroTKIua","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzU_EPUBxG","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzb7HngWs4","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]