Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G bruh i only use snapchat hopefully none of my friends know how to deepfake but i… ytc_UgxYVGVFz… G What the hell is this on about, i am very wholesome on AI chats what???? What ya… ytc_UgwnMil_f… G Real Update: He actually ended up investing a quarter million to develop a free … ytc_UgzHEhmvv… G Gen AI's potential for evil seems a lot higher than it's potential for good. Sca… ytc_Ugw3Xoun1… G if AI is just a tool then challenge them to use other tools like paint & brushes… ytc_UgxL2ofLb… G “We are people and what we care about is other people….and ourselves” Hmmm has t… ytc_UgzKMIFwE… G At least for the foreseeable future, Ai will need us to build out, maintain and … ytc_Ugy-_pqDS… G Musk has been candid about the dangers of AI. Hinton sounds like a shitlib who h… ytc_Ugzxu7fDM…

Comment

Disagree. The actual problem is that people keep wanting to approach this from a legal/illegal point of view. That's a losing argument. Deepfakes should NOT be illegal. It's literally not the person. It's literally not non-consensual porn. It is a fake. We have had fake porn since the internet, and before. Only difference is it's more realistic and easier to make. The answer is making it easier to sue creators of such content and remove such content from the internet. Personally, if such content required a disclaimer stating it is a parody, not real, just like how cartoons, ect, do when they have a character based on a real person appear on them, that is enough. Once again. It's art. Not real. Legislating it as thought it is a real nude lessens the impact of real non-consensual porn, and it completely opens freedom of artistic expression up to massive censorship. It's also not practical. Requiring disclaimers and tools to bring civil suite is both practical, already partially exists, and it protects freedom of artistic expression.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2023-05-22T01:0… ♥ 6

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzVw1CiP9l","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzYiIG9z-B","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKEvIo0Ybp81UcRed4AaABAg.9pzRvfPdcSJ9pzfi_waVSP","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY_MpVgjktRfuENgR4AaABAg.9pzR5c7SZ5s9pzRe1Fbpnv","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV1iuCVbiUArKqcvx4AaABAg.9pzQcGlt9fe9q-TPa03v6f","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9pzr0dRxs_K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9q-CBnOoDbd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzTroTKIua","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzU_EPUBxG","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzb7HngWs4","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses