Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Why are you guys so obsessed with shiting on generative AI and the users of it s…
ytc_UgwT0YugW…
G
While the promise AI to be everything for everyone is a decade away, in the mean…
ytc_UgwyhFzec…
G
If the car is designed to be self-driving entirely. There is no need to have a d…
ytc_Ugxhzhse5…
G
Yeah, I think the risk we face at the moment is that they cut the jobs for AI be…
rdc_kqtb8eh
G
AI won’t destroy the human race, humans will use AI to destroy the human populat…
ytc_Ugy8QGe8B…
G
And just how does this differ from how "abstract thought" is created in humans? …
ytr_UgyLzqGZg…
G
Chatgpt is trash! I cant stand why it still exist! I cant figure out WHY I CANT …
ytc_UgzJIEI-S…
G
We have hit the limits of what what transformers can do with large language mode…
ytc_UgwZ5FHmp…
Comment
@DJVARAO "There’s no turning back from technological advances."
Cop out answer. We can and do regulate technology all the time. You have to imagine this is a passive unstoppable force because the reality that have the ability as a society to regulate is inconvenient to you.
You are also casually lumping in non generative tools like de-noising, edge detection, rotoscoping, etc with generative diffusion models that wholesale output images, because again nuance and context is your enemy.
The only way you can win this argument is by dumbing down the discourse so nobody can see you are lying.
Tangent, but in a completely unrelated comment section someone was wondering why writing teachers tell you not to use passive voice. The answer is that passive voice obscures information and creates ambiguity. It weakens an argument if used poorly or deceptively. Even people who don't have a great understanding of writing can sort of intuit that an argument written using a lot of passive voice is vague and possibly dishonest. Well, here you have a perfect example of that.
Double tangent, this is exactly the sort of nuanced abstract creative concept that AI is 100% incapable of engaging with. Its a good illustrative example of why the "but it learns like humans do! Its the same thing!" argument is bogus.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-11-02T13:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwEFqOLqKF830j4-rJ4AaABAg.AP1Zv3lsbFnAP4c8EWM9OP","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxFNoV0UxHtJDjVrJZ4AaABAg.AP1LLzm9c73AP2wFrJMg_F","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynWNMSnr_gtTz4VGF4AaABAg.AP0yT_v3oelAP11gub78jV","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynWNMSnr_gtTz4VGF4AaABAg.AP0yT_v3oelAP136UHnI5A","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynWNMSnr_gtTz4VGF4AaABAg.AP0yT_v3oelAP15AAfNdwP","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynWNMSnr_gtTz4VGF4AaABAg.AP0yT_v3oelAP1BCYVXW4p","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynWNMSnr_gtTz4VGF4AaABAg.AP0yT_v3oelAP1CMme4el5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwURnXv6_2XdUMx7oh4AaABAg.AP-maU3uyc_AP-mwDU-SvT","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPnpvDT0WC15IdsH94AaABAg.AOzplLckwIzAOzw6s4xYFk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzXxB-iym_wnhlYYF54AaABAg.AOynZgyrYMxAOzK2dX2aEu","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]