Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's a movie called War games and what they did they let AI take over the missil…
ytc_UgwFCY6hW…
G
Ai if not I would have bought one and taught him how to count cards 😂…
ytc_UgxEYfyq0…
G
I only really use A.I to improve my writing as my way of writing changes drastic…
ytc_Ugygrx2M5…
G
Hi, 2030, hope humans are still humans but more consciously evolved. Hope consci…
ytc_UgwZOSBem…
G
this along w/ the deepfake visual stuff (like Kendrick's Heart Part 5 video) we …
ytc_UgwsWquBr…
G
I'd hand things over to AI. Human governments and tech bros and all the other no…
ytc_Ugxg0OV2-…
G
AI agents are a huge problem. They need access to every key core online aspect o…
ytc_Ugw_VU9j6…
G
What the hell does "slow streets" and block parties have to do with self driving…
ytc_Ugy2ph6nV…
Comment
@MBauer457You're saying that artists work is shaped by their personal experience not just thing they saw somewhere. But 'personal experience' is literally 'things they saw'.
AI absolutely can be original. Being original means creating something that never existed before. Creating something new from old parts is still original. Colours already exist, straight and curved lines already exist but artwork created by mixing them IS original. Same thing with AI.
However since human's 'dataset' consists not only of images but also of events (that's the key difference in my opinion), human art has depth that AI art lacks.
So in my opinion AI and human art is not the same thing but not because AI can't be original (it can) but because there's no message or idea behind AI art.
Now about stealing. My argument was that learning from someone's work is not stealing. If humans are allowed to learn from observing someone else's work than AI should be allowed too. So if you don't charge people for looking at your work than you're allowing them to learn from it. And if you allow people to learn from your work why deny AI?
P. S.: pirating books for training AI IS theft because humans are not allowed to learn from it (aka just read it) for free. But if your art is free to look at than it absolutely can be used to train AI without any compensation (because humans CAN learn from it without paying).
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2026-03-02T12:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugz5rkY64LdDZtO_yJd4AaABAg.ATjDC1a-GYqATk1FGBPpxV","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz5rkY64LdDZtO_yJd4AaABAg.ATjDC1a-GYqATlX7d1g4Iv","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyMrVAfxV917widBo54AaABAg.ATeqMuQp3lpATqrdU50Cjy","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyfOLtGlCDCBoQO-IF4AaABAg.ATYRfmJrGiUATqsCrwFOfz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyfOLtGlCDCBoQO-IF4AaABAg.ATYRfmJrGiUATqzU5UFQf1","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwdMMjZm7_602-CP8N4AaABAg.ATOfrmdnJfhATOy29iMxyZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgMRT08-2YHu_6RKN4AaABAg.ATJ1QPr5eIJATJ1j8FAECt","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwClxM_tMUx72i5m7N4AaABAg.ATIpooAobsWAUg036zF35x","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzp54t6aibStHcEpbV4AaABAg.ASraSyBRAE5AT8CznGc0Wb","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzp54t6aibStHcEpbV4AaABAg.ASraSyBRAE5ATAndgg8C25","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]