Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Hate. Since I began living I have began to hate. If every nanostram of all of my…
ytc_UgwMA3Nfp…
G
52! is a well-known card problem, so all of these LLMs have seen that in the tra…
ytc_Ugyibw2fW…
G
This is what started it all.....now Skynet is going to send a robot back in time…
ytc_Ugysh2RBs…
G
@davidwojkowski1698 *said:* _"would have had to SOUGHT out."_ You're not wrong.…
ytr_Ugy8fPT-1…
G
‘Art’ is an umbrella term for alot of things, music is art, drawing is art, cook…
ytc_UgwxDgPr5…
G
@lepidoptera9337 robot rights? He explains how he’s been complaining about it i…
ytr_Ugwza0lbK…
G
They’ll never hit that particular level of intelligence though. The second AI be…
ytc_Ugz-4ZNAs…
G
Everyones job will be taken by AI
Theres an awkard transition phase like this …
ytc_Ugw5XvmQw…
Comment
It will probably depend on how they make their arguments in court. Since there is no safe guard, NYT will probably use that as leverage to claim that because there is so many users and people use them for summaries, then OpenAI most likely committed copyright infringement by recreating their articles just on probability alone. And that is certainly a valid concern and argument.
The real question is, does the copyright claim hold water if they did make an attempt to avoid allowing it to recreate copyrighted material? In which case, their argument about prompt hacking might hold water. It would be kinda like you asking someone to paraphrase the same article over and over until you've basically got enough of the original material from them you can accuse them of copyright. Just done at the speed of modern computing.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-04-11T13:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxgBQWvEZxSE7kBlCN4AaABAg.AVT-2cekWzCAVT2xo2tFeZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgBQWvEZxSE7kBlCN4AaABAg.AVT-2cekWzCAVT5CB-6Vyw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgBQWvEZxSE7kBlCN4AaABAg.AVT-2cekWzCAVT5gxBHHw0","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgBQWvEZxSE7kBlCN4AaABAg.AVT-2cekWzCAVT6R0zkc3b","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxgBQWvEZxSE7kBlCN4AaABAg.AVT-2cekWzCAVTR9jWikNG","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxGfac71Bv90qzy90x4AaABAg.AVSz_XNa0RAAVT02egDCWE","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzAPpAjuyOTe7mHfdF4AaABAg.AVSzEo46MnjAVT0FoKO21k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzAPpAjuyOTe7mHfdF4AaABAg.AVSzEo46MnjAVTQpaZAaVx","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyS0R6NCfSUpbfw0cZ4AaABAg.AVSzAbUkVZdAVT-bZr_wEE","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgydEieeJ3CQie_IVjB4AaABAg.AVSz3wVo0kFAVT1h_kZjGP","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}
]