Raw LLM Responses

The difference between a mentor and AI is that the mentor wants you to learn so that you can succeed and stand on your own some day. A mentor challenges you and teaches you how to seek answers from sources of knowledge and inspiration so that you may be able to figure things out when they're gone. AI doesn't do this. It will always just give answers without question. It will never care to see you stand on your own two feet. It will never challenge you to seek the answers on your own. It doesn't want you to be independent, in fact those who are in charge of this technology would love if you became entirely dependent on it. AI is not like asking a helpful mentor a question, because mentors want you to grow. If people use AI for "idea expansion" it will be used for more and more, because the person asking questions will have no incentive not to do so, and no incentive to learn things on their own. You can't tell people that X and Y are okay ways to use AI, but Z isn't. Why isn't Z okay to use? Why are X and Y deemed okay? Why do you think that someone's arbitrary opinion of what is and isn't morally okay about AI use even matters to people who use it? The hard truth is that this technology cannot be used at all without the eventual increase of reliance and abuse.