Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G NOT ALL who control AI r responsible SO PLEASE ACT with 🦉ness & INTEGR… ytc_UgxwBX1DM… G They don't deserve human rights, they deserve robot rights. Human rights must be… ytc_Ugy1IVC_X… G Hi, I actually make fine tunes for a SDXL based model called Illustrious by Onom… ytc_Ugz3TEHuw… G It's definitely a fascinating topic! The future of AI and robotics is filled wit… ytr_Ugw-BtUDz… G This is exactly the same i think when i talk to chatgpt and use words carefully … ytc_UgyZs_IAy… G Humans have been eliminating other humans since the beginning of time. Humans cr… ytc_UgyIYNTVq… G Literally yesterday I got r@ped by a 32 year old in chat AI and my parents found… ytc_UgwHGLGAA… G I think that robot's purpose at the beginning is to pass butter... Oh my god… ytc_UgimBcFcL…
Comment
Yes and no. Because AI needs an input (and an output) prompt, the current way it works probably won't do the full set of tasks better than a human can. If the only aim was productivity, humans working with AI would probably be the most effective. Thing is, which few people account for: Companies hate workers. Personnel costs is the majority of costs of most (if not all) companies. So even if AI will do the job worse than people, *it would still be worth it for the companies.* Cutting some production in favor of vastly lowered costs (we're talking 50% or something), would probably be a winning strategy. Not only that, but by cutting workers off of production, you remove their power. Strikes? Useless. Boycotts? Outdated. Unions? Pointless. Without being tied to production, workers can't make a reason for companies to care about their rights or needs. So basically, AI probably won't be as good as humans are, but it doesn't need to be. It just needs to be good enough.
youtube AI Jobs 2025-09-10T22:3… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyregulate
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytr_Ugyj4hmaQ7m2ABDVKwZ4AaABAg.AMv64sHUSOmAMw0hCsg3_E","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytr_UgwbFVeBPLe-u8hUcSN4AaABAg.AMucBAnSrfVAMva3jtb-ye","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMu_i0N-yEy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMviBII6Tgn","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMvi_UQDGul","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_UgxdPJEGAbpI5rB-Svh4AaABAg.AE_Cn_ZPUOjAPchAc6vuQn","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzHyOQBTTjDmIyBO5d4AaABAg.AEQqMR514UtARylXQgKw2o","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgxHfGnh5L7CdBhzQvF4AaABAg.AEPGOMfszOMAPch3Oa4M2V","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzH6AIwAo7-NJjkrmJ4AaABAg.A0oHwbHLDfyA0xSbW9xpLy","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugw1i8eGpRAK2YvzMH94AaABAg.9rxxb5j63hI9sJX5ANahNN","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"} ]