Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G We shouldn't focus on advancing artificial intelligence when we're still dealing… ytc_UgxhYt-Nl… G As an artist myself, I desperately hate it when people say that AI art is more a… ytc_UgwQoIuHR… G I heard some Ai “artist” having plans to make business out of it that can be don… ytc_UgyYvfZlp… G Owners of AI? Why would AI want to ruled by some humans? What stops AI becoming … rdc_mxywb09 G I'm not an engineer but surely the best design for this kind of facilty would be… ytc_UgzoPMpOl… G I ain't reading allat lil bro AI is the future ya'll just stuck a banana to a wa… ytr_UgyQ-HqRz… G It’s still just crafting a neat fiction. GPT5 is gonna be the one though 😱… ytc_Ugy4HrteH… G This is also a good reminder that ChatGPT and the like were created to model lan… ytc_UgzbzycBH…

Comment

Yes and no. Because AI needs an input (and an output) prompt, the current way it works probably won't do the full set of tasks better than a human can. If the only aim was productivity, humans working with AI would probably be the most effective. Thing is, which few people account for: Companies hate workers. Personnel costs is the majority of costs of most (if not all) companies. So even if AI will do the job worse than people, *it would still be worth it for the companies.* Cutting some production in favor of vastly lowered costs (we're talking 50% or something), would probably be a winning strategy. Not only that, but by cutting workers off of production, you remove their power. Strikes? Useless. Boycotts? Outdated. Unions? Pointless. Without being tied to production, workers can't make a reason for companies to care about their rights or needs. So basically, AI probably won't be as good as humans are, but it doesn't need to be. It just needs to be good enough.

youtube AI Jobs 2025-09-10T22:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_Ugyj4hmaQ7m2ABDVKwZ4AaABAg.AMv64sHUSOmAMw0hCsg3_E","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbFVeBPLe-u8hUcSN4AaABAg.AMucBAnSrfVAMva3jtb-ye","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMu_i0N-yEy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMviBII6Tgn","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMvi_UQDGul","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxdPJEGAbpI5rB-Svh4AaABAg.AE_Cn_ZPUOjAPchAc6vuQn","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzHyOQBTTjDmIyBO5d4AaABAg.AEQqMR514UtARylXQgKw2o","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxHfGnh5L7CdBhzQvF4AaABAg.AEPGOMfszOMAPch3Oa4M2V","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzH6AIwAo7-NJjkrmJ4AaABAg.A0oHwbHLDfyA0xSbW9xpLy","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw1i8eGpRAK2YvzMH94AaABAg.9rxxb5j63hI9sJX5ANahNN","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses