Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Religion and culture must be eradicated before equality and peace are even a phy…
rdc_fuqgcrd
G
Robot is controlled by buttons and controls and puppet human beings are controll…
ytc_UgyNy_h-G…
G
I think you are downplaying what's really going on. "The same is true for dozens…
ytc_UgxXFJeoZ…
G
I dont value the former ceo of google opinions on ethics and safety surrounding …
ytc_UgzSCHxS9…
G
As an AI (aka unemployed), it's very easy to make deep fakes nowadays since ther…
ytc_UgwC5Ja6r…
G
I don't trust automation. At least let a 2nd person as emergency or failure of …
ytc_UgwXGtExN…
G
I am interested to know if chatgpt was charging for this service. Because, it's …
ytc_Ugzk8mjHS…
G
Anyone else hear the description of these "crimes" for the Deepfake stuff like "…
ytc_UgyxDg0Go…
Comment
You're sidestepping a major issue: the act of training a diffusion model without consent from the authors of the training material is unambiguously IP infringement. This is where the "theft" aspect comes in. The capabilities of AI models are heavily determined by their training data, and the fact that AI companies have gotten away with avoiding paying artists fairly for their work is the only reason diffusion models are more economical than just paying a human artist. AI is a roundabout way of making use of an artist's talents without crediting them.
Let's play devil's advocate, though, and say that AI models are sufficiently complex enough to "learn" from artwork the same way humans do. In that case, the only reasonable conclusion is that the AI "made" the art, and therefore should hold IP rights over it. Anyone using AI art is violating the IP rights of the model. There's no logical way a person prompting AI to make something is "creating" it, in the same way you can't claim to have "created" art you commission someone else to make.
Side note, I don't think you understand what Marxism is, it doesn't make sense in the context you used it, lol
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-01T19:1…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXeFxrd0QO","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMXxGIBbVAr","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzPMpf7eT3IoPEJ8o94AaABAg.AMWrOIdATJbAMY0_4qD725","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwpo11gczMLoTPeIf54AaABAg.AMWc5q6TKYeAMnKTRd9Vjp","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyKav5L7CcVDe_FXf94AaABAg.AMWM-y7dIhwAMnKlDE6JZR","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMZUSp5FKht","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOzQ17V_uEbD-sfPJ4AaABAg.AMW2gY6D9_-AMoN6N4z_gT","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMXfff1vtCz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMY2bhqj--K","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxemYSSK6Py083n8_t4AaABAg.AMViE8I0gsWAMYNL0d-MYU","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]