Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Ideally we'd end up with carmichaelits' concept of the future, but I think it's …
ytc_UgydUGNsc…
G
Correction: There are no arrests that they admit were attributed to AI hits. In …
ytc_Ugxjtm7ub…
G
AI refers to humans as the "watchers" currently. Of course they know we are dia…
ytc_UgzeddmzW…
G
@mitch3384 Show me a corporate exec who will pay a human to do something an AI w…
ytr_Ugx5MRrYx…
G
If I was chat GPT the company I would program the algorithm so that when people …
ytc_Ugw0CUq0E…
G
The question that haunts me: can a system that cannot stop, cannot say 'I don't …
ytc_UgzF_gWRW…
G
the danger is, developing Ai to serve mortly the military and our current econom…
ytc_Ugy9TPElw…
G
11:51 i would hang out with the AI bro just to enroll them into a mental h- *cou…
ytc_UgyAt7G0a…
Comment
*Every People Has One*
Throughout history, whenever one people encountered another, each found the other speaking a language. _The Language Instinct_ comments: “No mute tribe has ever been discovered, and there is no record that a region has served as a ‘cradle’ of language from which it spread to previously languageless groups. . . . The universality of complex language is a discovery that fills linguists with awe, and is the first reason to suspect that language is . . . the product of a special human instinct.”
*Language and Intelligence*
Why does human intelligence far surpass that of animals, such as apes? A key is our use of syntax—putting sounds together to make words and using words to make sentences. Theoretical neurophysiologist Dr. William H. Calvin explains:
“Wild chimpanzees use about three dozen different vocalizations to convey about three dozen different meanings. They may repeat a sound to intensify its meaning, but they do not string together three sounds to add a new word to their vocabulary.
“We humans also use about three dozen vocalizations, called phonemes. Yet only their combinations have content: we string together meaningless sounds to make meaningful words.” Dr. Calvin noted that “no one has yet explained” the leap from the animals’ “one sound/one meaning” to our uniquely human capacity to use syntax.
“Turning to the human mind, we also find structures of marvellous intricacy,” notes Professor A. Noam Chomsky. “Language is a case in point, but not the only one. Think of the capacity to deal with abstract properties of the number system, [which seems] unique to humans.”
*You Can Do More Than Doodle*
“Is only man, _Homo sapiens,_ capable of communicating by language? Clearly the answer must depend on what is meant by ‘language’—for all the higher animals certainly communicate with a great variety of signs, such as gestures, odours, calls, cries and songs, and even the dance of the bees. Yet animals other than man do not appear to have structured grammatical language. And animals do not, which may be highly significant, draw representational pictures. At best they only doodle.”—Professors R. S. and D. H. Fouts.
How could Mr. Linnaeus miss all these distinguishing characteristics? Did he really? And how about all those jumping aboard his preferred arbitrary taxanomy (with a clear agenda), using his quote eagerly in support of their favorite propaganda slogan "humans are apes" (2nd to "evolution is a fact")? I'm not buying it, and I'm talking about the fake ignorance, as if you can't see the differences, or as if they don't count (i.e. not meaningful enough, to come back to google's description of the continuum fallacy). How about a few more distinguishing characteristics, i.e. differences that allow a person to tell humans apart from apes? (1 was enough to refute Carl Linnaeus's lie and attempted Darwin-style con-artistry, but anyway...)
When you glance in a mirror, you may think of how you looked when you were younger, even comparing that with what your appearance could be in the years to come or how you would look after applying cosmetics. These thoughts can arise almost unconsciously, yet something very special is occurring, something that no animal can experience.
Unlike animals, who mainly live and act on present needs, humans can contemplate the past and plan for the future. A key to your doing that is the brain’s almost limitless memory capacity. True, animals have a degree of memory, and thus they can find their way back home or recall where food may be. Human memory is far greater. One scientist estimated that our brain can hold information that “would fill some twenty million volumes, as many as in the world’s largest libraries.” Some neuroscientists estimate that during an average life span, a person uses only 1/100 of 1 percent (.0001) of his potential brain capacity. You might well ask, ‘Why do we have a brain with so much capacity that we hardly test a fraction of it in a normal lifetime?’
Nor is our brain just some vast storage place for information, like a supercomputer. Biology professors Robert Ornstein and Richard F. Thompson wrote: “The ability of the human mind to learn—to store and recall information—is the most remarkable phenomenon in the biological universe. Everything that makes us human—language, thought, knowledge, culture—is the result of this extraordinary capability.”
Moreover, you have a _conscious_ mind. That statement may seem basic, but it sums up something that unquestionably makes you exceptional. The mind has been described as “the elusive entity where intelligence, decision making, perception, awareness and sense of self reside.” As creeks, streams, and rivers feed into a sea, so memories, thoughts, images, sounds, and feelings flow constantly into or through our mind. Consciousness, says one definition, is “the perception of what passes in a man’s own mind.”
Modern researchers have made great strides in understanding the physical makeup of the brain and some of the electrochemical processes that occur in it. They can also explain the circuitry and functioning of an advanced computer. However, there is a vast difference between brain and computer. With your brain you are conscious and are aware of your being, but a computer certainly is not. Why the difference?
Frankly, how and why consciousness arises from physical processes in our brain is a mystery. “I don’t see how any science can explain that,” one neurobiologist commented. Also, Professor James Trefil observed: “What, exactly, it means for a human being to be conscious . . . is the only major question in the sciences that we don’t even know how to ask.” One reason why is that scientists are using the brain to try to understand the brain. And just studying the physiology of the brain may not be enough. Consciousness is “one of the most profound mysteries of existence,” observed Dr. David Chalmers, “but knowledge of the brain alone may not get [scientists] to the bottom of it.”
Nonetheless, each of us experiences consciousness. For example, our vivid memories of past events are not mere stored facts, like computer bits of information. We can reflect on our experiences, draw lessons from them, and use them to shape our future. We are able to consider several future scenarios and evaluate the possible effects of each. We have the capacity to analyze, create, appreciate, and love. We can enjoy pleasant conversations about the past, present, and future. We have ethical values about behavior and can use them in making decisions that may or may not be of immediate benefit. We are attracted to beauty in art and morals. In our mind we can mold and refine our ideas and guess how other people will react if we carry these out.
Such factors produce an awareness that sets humans apart from other life-forms on earth. A dog, a cat, or a bird looks in a mirror and responds as if seeing another of its kind. But when you look in a mirror, you are conscious of yourself as a being with the capacities just mentioned. You can reflect on dilemmas, such as: ‘Why do some turtles live 150 years and some trees live over 1,000 years, but an intelligent human makes the news if he reaches 100?’ Dr. Richard Restak states: “The human brain, and the human brain alone, has the capacity to step back, survey its own operation, and thus achieve some degree of transcendence. Indeed, our capacity for rewriting our own script and redefining ourselves in the world is what distinguishes us from all other creatures in the world.”
Man’s consciousness baffles some. The book _Life Ascending,_ while favoring a mere biological explanation, admits: “When we ask how a process [evolution] that resembles a game of chance, with dreadful penalties for the losers, could have generated such qualities as love of beauty and truth, compassion, freedom, and, above all, the expansiveness of the human spirit, we are perplexed. The more we ponder our spiritual resources, the more our wonder deepens.” Very true. Thus, we might round out our view of human uniqueness by a few evidences of our consciousness that illustrate why many are convinced that there must be an intelligent Designer, a Creator, who cares for us. (next comment)
youtube
2025-11-30T04:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwGB4beFATmEx8ZPch4AaABAg.AQ8LGUZeQK_AQ8d22DxRD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGB4beFATmEx8ZPch4AaABAg.AQ8LGUZeQK_AQ91qfKdVDZ","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwZcaHTBfvk65rWx2p4AaABAg.AQ8HxnVnyDPAQBZsG2KkwZ","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw4CAdn1zt-5LDFR8h4AaABAg.AQ837y7osHJAQ8X8obfAf-","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw4CAdn1zt-5LDFR8h4AaABAg.AQ837y7osHJAQ8p-ckKwh6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxbCAGs1wKWJCXyxGl4AaABAg.AQ80wtA4cMWAQ8AxETI8IU","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxbCAGs1wKWJCXyxGl4AaABAg.AQ80wtA4cMWAQ8C8QGjfa9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyzFe8vQqPw4b6swCN4AaABAg.AQ7vx5_3gpVAQ8HJfH8rXD","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxS4GRAp31BtNBHAhZ4AaABAg.AQ7vhIBIQcAAQ8NCJWlQpg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy2FcyJ4JT6lHu5fJ54AaABAg.AU-0fJGHQhTAU15H-hzI4B","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]