Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI fanatics will never cease to amaze me with their stupidity and lack of abilit…
ytc_UgxYl1lv-…
G
Governments of the world making weapons powered by AI and using them to cull the…
ytc_Ugxsb1J-P…
G
It’s also important to acknowledge that, yes, AI is cheap for now; however, it m…
ytc_UgzCxS06B…
G
@Carguytct Definitely- don't forget it got a 5 year lead as well. I'm surprised…
ytr_UgyhRbTAe…
G
>AI will be better at every single thing that humans do within ten years.
Na…
rdc_k9i909k
G
I have a better solution for this -> agentic boards of investors. have AI autono…
ytc_Ugw8T7E-a…
G
Is it unreasonable to assume that Mark Zuckerberg saw the impact and political i…
rdc_m5nmcox
G
This is really weird, those names-Susan Verghese, George Scaria Verghese, Anish …
ytc_Ugws1nWd7…
Comment
Anybody that writes a story is an author, a good author using an AI to help write a story will only really be using it to break apart writer's block and to feed them ideas or give them some filler between important sections of their stories.
A bad author might use an LLM to generate the entirety of their book.
LLMs are a tool, and saying that an author isn't an author because they use a specific tool is just plain foolishness.
What you're trying to do is delegitimize people you don't agree with by gate keeping the title of "author" from them.
They're authors, are they good authors? Maybe not, but they're still authors.
A 2 year old scribbling gibberish onto a piece of paper is still an author or an artist, they're _also_ a 2 year old scribbling onto a piece of paper and not really making anything of value, but that doesn't take away from the classification.
A bad author is a bad author, but they're still an author there's no reason to try and distance them from other authors just because they use a tool you don't agree with.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-08-31T16:3…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxNDqj1FlDsiAFspGl4AaABAg.A7ps2H0nu-eA7vD3mWnFO","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy46Wf0e71bUX0wpaJ4AaABAg.A7pWr6FJeKyA7pbBkKZ6qF","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyNzMF9XuRVCKMzlCt4AaABAg.A7oyWSEGHODAI_z0yFw4vY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzi6o59I-V8wTiIvop4AaABAg.A7or9F8pyZ-A7rWw1uOVTw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugzi6o59I-V8wTiIvop4AaABAg.A7or9F8pyZ-A7r_bI_QWOA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzVIinh10SJs8Gpc_x4AaABAg.A7oGBfO-GFWA7q2PFqoFYl","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGwDG6rKFj6Cy7r5J4AaABAg.A7o8YfEGH6qA7t7UP6kWDw","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxz0i65KH2Jil0V69p4AaABAg.A7myu7y_5ZwA7oMJLZnVCs","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwXitAvpkr_fWPJhZ94AaABAg.A7mU_knRuTAA7oL-CGzYK2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwFO4vYTHYH2f6Eil94AaABAg.A7mK0I42AQeA7oIh6FA2K2","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]