Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So how do we know that at roughly +2C the Earth will begin warming itself? How d…
rdc_et7ai29
G
I would volunteer to be either a business owner with a fully automated workforce…
ytc_UgyPP6kGX…
G
If I had ChatGPT in 2001 in the 6th grade I'd be using it for every single assig…
ytc_Ugwy4ATO9…
G
Because it is more profitable to exploit the planet to death and let the millenn…
rdc_espbuup
G
it makes sense too, because when people use ai, their brain become too lazy to t…
ytr_UgwwNV0vs…
G
ALMOST NOT QUITE BUT KEEP PRACTICING AND YOU'LL GET THERE IT'S JUST AS REAL AS T…
ytc_Ugx1qJpIk…
G
Well... Uhm... In my country they made a full 4ss movie with FULL ai. Ai trailer…
ytc_UgxgFwqR-…
G
Your so awesome. When will you come out with your pertinent version of AI Law? …
ytc_UgzGBGmFA…
Comment
I was desperately looking for that comment! Actually, even defining consciousness is very tricky. Researchers from all fields still don’t know what consciousness is or how it works.
What Geoffrey describes is still an overly simplistic explanation of consciousness, and when you really think about it, it doesn’t explain anything.
This so-called “fear response” doesn’t prove at all that a robot actually possesses self-awareness or an experience of being alive.
You can have sensory input and programmed reactions to it without any subjective experience of existence.
Just because a computer learns to recognize patterns and mimic human-like responses within those patterns, that doesn’t mean it knows it’s alive.
In that regard, I think Geoffrey seriously overreaches—and ends up dragging the whole discussion into a kind of vague “woo-woo spiritual territory,” if you know what I mean.
Yes, consciousness is complex, and yes, we don’t fully understand it yet.
But just because we can’t explain it doesn’t mean it’s inherently “special” or non-material. It simply means: we don’t know enough yet.
Maybe a machine could develop consciousness one day. But how would we prove it?
A machine can deliver a perfect simulation of consciousness.
But fundamentally, we can’t even prove that another human being, someone other than ourselves, experiences consciousness the same way we do.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-22T01:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwDaczyG8sHw6rRJ494AaABAg.AJY8DtX0MlcAJeJ-Uda8kl","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwDaczyG8sHw6rRJ494AaABAg.AJY8DtX0MlcAJiPiASnaX5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzyX4v3V9H1JEm11hd4AaABAg.AJY6tbnParDAJYfHQkuqGt","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyE7E7EQk_9tVAu4YN4AaABAg.AJXuoUDr4gUAJXwjm-3XIC","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxGbl4WYv3AA8pBHfF4AaABAg.AJXrTV12ej7AJsWCyUD4Ka","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyTepygKhROCqAW8XF4AaABAg.AJXpwG68PTcAJ_xnITI7Zq","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxtbEDOgBFAoD7114J4AaABAg.AJXandExCZcAJXb9qgbTiL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxfdrCcOs-mYhTasVt4AaABAg.AJX_SeziVU9AJY9wsdUlbZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzqQmRh3winnptBSKx4AaABAg.AJX9wFHmMCWAJXflqRjsPz","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyiC12707IOMMTeYHB4AaABAg.AJX8PoVrS4TAKSW8V1gU-z","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"}
]