Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I think this is also a wonderful thing to be misused by time for oppression of h…
ytc_UgxjkSgSU…
G
Every time I get an AI at a drive through an actual human follows up and confirm…
rdc_mt8pt9s
G
Yeah, I tell it the BPM, a few styles (trance/house/dance/etc.), and I tell it w…
ytr_Ugysn5vXi…
G
@Secret_Pickle Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthropic it is fair use... …
ytr_UgyTy3H39…
G
Nicely said! As the sole Product Designer (User Experience) at the startup I wor…
ytc_Ugxg3H4aO…
G
Yeah, nah, I ain't finna call myself an artist. Only in my music making, I can d…
ytc_UgzAxMcRh…
G
If a computer nerd warns me about something with computers I’m listening. Going …
ytc_UgwAdX1__…
G
People in 2017: A.I voices of politicians will be used to manipulate the public …
ytc_Ugx_Dghkz…
Comment
Yes, I'll be honest, as a consumer (not an artist), I couldn't care less about "art" and "artists" in the sense the author of this video is using. It's much more important to me to be able to quickly get the art I need, rather than hiring artists, waiting a month, and paying half my salary for some primitive social media art... but the author of the video clearly doesn't care about art consumers either, and their goal is to make money from the images they create, and AI is simply a more effective competitor in this field, am I not right? That's why most artists are outraged.
And the argument about plagiarism is certainly a whole other level... I'm just curious why no companies or artists are upset that other artists are creating memes and art featuring famous characters that's littered across the internet? And that's not copyright infringement (unless, of course, they sell the art). However, if someone generates the same art featuring a famous character using AI, that's an immediate copyright infringement. What's the logic?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-10-18T17:0…
♥ 1
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugx1--Pckefwjce57NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9wjNpToarLoc_Q6R4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzqPWtS9oSti0j8cwx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz13MYXfgH6X0CGOpN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxh7jBQIXEbTfeTOLp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3FYxh09g5X1dI2Nt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhqIyKsKx6aH3fNcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwS6-rP2H_fNI-PcYx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzwCdMqwmHPVvBE25N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQvfguEkHHRVpXZwB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}]