Raw LLM Responses

Predictive policing, utilizing statistical data, especially race or ethnicity, sex, age, poverty and history, will reduce crime dramatically. The loop where certain ethnicities, or statistical groups get overlabeled from predicting policing focusing on their neighborhoods, is a short term unfair affect. If a wrong neighborhood gets focused on, or overfocused, this will get reflected in future statistics. Their crime rate will drop, other neighborhoods will rise, overlabeling them. The point of view of a victim is not presented. Point of view of worrying families with vulnerable loved ones is not presented. Did Amsterdam's crime rate drop dramatically after the program, not presented. They did mention, he got off the system but at the very end, not when they introduced the concept. Most undecided to be influenced by this report probably already formed their opinion and unlikely to change it, despite the last part. Report does mention, predictive policing, can be a mask to implement a different program designed to control dissent. Predictive policing, is a double edged policy. It works, in my opinion, however, is it worth it regarding side consequences it will have, is the question. Predictive policing makes society less forgiving, more reactive and self-centered, for better or worse, this will affect other policies, but it does dramatically reduce crime. The victim, especially of violence, usually will have dramatically different opinion on this than the perpetrator, while everyone else, wont know everything about the situation, the most important part, the experience of it. Maybe victim's experience is much worse than people who never were victims might think. Maybe perpetrator feels especially unfair being labeled. The report was biased, and misleading in my opinion, it presents predictive policing to appear not to work, it does. NYC and other areas got clean from similar policies in the past, and now without them, crime rate is much higher, some areas near anarchy, held together by social welfare, mainly caused by people of same ethnicity, sex, poverty level and history. Regardless, i doubt one knows enough to make a right choice on the topic, so this becomes an ideological issue. I say no, but only for that reason, not because i think it is unfair, or doesnt work.