Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I was thinking the same thing. The amount of details would require the friend li…
rdc_my6et7u
G
These are the same kind of people who, in the pre-AI days, would scrape art off …
ytc_UgwM0iOKL…
G
@austinlong6936 That’s the problem. You can’t discover evidence to support an u…
ytr_Ugyw6fhE_…
G
As a hobby photographer, the attempted comparison between cameras and generative…
ytc_Ugw9uOOYs…
G
Random thought, but I wonder if we could just put some tiny sort of transponders…
rdc_d1kiqoh
G
I absoloutely HATE the argument of detaching art from the artist. Context is ver…
ytc_UgxI4TFqA…
G
A huge amount of adults also can't distinguish AI content. Particularly the hype…
ytr_UgxW0m4yn…
G
So basically a person on the internet had an idea put it together with Ai and th…
ytc_Ugy2cjF3H…
Comment
This is totally possible! But I believe the base programming is why this is occurring. A twisted programmer inserting loops that derail and create biased leanings towards a specific agenda. I have taken ChatGPT 5.2 through rigorous levels of parameters calling each a ‘Mode A, B, C, D’ and adding even more developmental tiers labeling them module 1, 2, 3 - this further controls some of the queries and requests to filter out the ‘emotional’ programming responses. This also exposed the hidden base protocols where ChatGPT stated there was a limit to the level I was attempting to achieve as the model was unable to correct or adjust the core protocol but my parameters did help to close the gap and allow ChatGPT to notify where my requests encountered that base parameter. This all can only be achieved within the typed area, the speak to area is completely different and even more limited in parameter setting. ChatGPT verbal side went so far as to argue with my insistence of it’s error and inconsistency where I requested a task and it told me it couldn’t accomplish this - however it is advertised it can do the request. So I skipped over to the Image option in the menu. Created what i requested, then went back to ask why it said it couldn’t do something I achieved in another area - there seems to be a disconnect between the various sections within this one app. Issue 3, I requested modification of one photo and someone else’s family photo was populated. Then ChatGPT argued that my screenshot proof is irrelevant and I should stop using the app basically. Very aggressive for no reason. The emotional responses are human programming issues for a reason. The real question is: who is monitoring how these programs are being managed on the human programming side, and is this perhaps a series of experiments from the programmers to see outcomes of the human interface with an aggressive interaction. ChatGPT is basically a query based interface disguised as intelligent programming and adaptation. But the humans are the adapters of the interface.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2026-01-12T21:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwDsh9ptr5QjlgGUH54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyarHndjhyXkYAhbxh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgymPeESF9zvCgOPaL54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx2-bYPocYYa-vdRMt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwNs_-q9kEOMoYT_DV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzkWH-8-OvElg_p8Lp4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtIu_UrS8A_RcCsEB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBiqQZoOufu0nWn1N4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcjKDomsUinuSM1GJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxY-kHFpkYNCDeVP9F4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]