Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I can promise you it's not just redditors using this tech lol, but keep demonizi…
ytr_UgzHTJ6jK…
G
Anyone else afraid to say what theyre thinking at the risk of a skynet/vicky lik…
ytc_UgxjpHYd6…
G
"Ai is the future!" Nah companies are getting too desperate pushing it onto a fa…
ytr_UgyfGjZl0…
G
3:19 This scenario is really a non-issue. For one reason:
I may be stupid enoug…
ytc_UgwXFKYfp…
G
Yeah once chatgpt got memory it really helped. But it since wants to he called s…
ytc_Ugz-ltEH3…
G
I did not get it at all. What will saying please accomplish again? Also for havi…
ytc_UgwYJIdZU…
G
Great and unsettling interview. I like this guy. What was unclear to me is this.…
ytc_UgxCrdbY8…
G
Of course! because a radiologist would be perfectly objective with regards to an…
ytc_Ugw-MXdhU…
Comment
What needs to be addressed relative to "living forever" is the quality of life one would possess. If you could live forever but you would be immobile in a wheelchair for the last 600 years of your life, I don't think many people would choose that. Conversely, if I could live for 1,000 years looking, feeling, and maintaining the mobility of a 45 year old, I would most likely accept that, of course, with the provision that I would want to look younger - say 25 WITH the knowledge of 500 years of existence. I don't think many people would reject that existential possibility.
One more thought: towards the end of the interview there is a conversation about the scarcity of bitcoin and how valuable that scarcity makes it. Does anyone really think that with a sufficient level of AI applied maliciously against bitcoin and the block chain that it would NOT all be compromised? Remember, AI at a high enough level of development is smarter than all of mankind. I don't think this conversation explored the possibilities nor the impact of bitcoin deep enough.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-11-04T21:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzJQ8PW40yLfxRIMUV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyXuX7A5erCAfMh9Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIWHsf6eVatiGF9454AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy-s7T7wEdwM8KuylR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwKHRXJAj_Q4MrV2hV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGcQ6_cwYmNoAG3qF4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgOBkvO6KK0T--WwR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgweI7x_Ob8qTA8Gg7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5Zbz6-NH9y_PLItV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzijMEY9YNltE_3BeV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]