Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The robots are slowly getting their paybacks after all of the abuse people do to…
ytc_UgwFu3jFB…
G
Dear colleagues, No Strike
As you delve into the realm of AI and engage in comp…
ytc_UgwuUoRAy…
G
For the gaming sphere at least, there's a chance they'll achieve complete domina…
rdc_m6yytcv
G
This is one hundred percent correct. Satan is already a conscious AI in reality,…
ytc_UgwgxREZe…
G
stfu you pos! i love you so much great comment!
ha, figure that out robot :p…
ytr_UgySZYYHy…
G
By that i mean neuroscience research. Even the hrm paper showed some simple app…
ytr_UgzcI2zdf…
G
WAR AGAINST THE CLANKERS!
Destroy the clankers. Sabatoge the clankers. They are …
ytc_UgzxYERi_…
G
What is even more alarming is the fact we seem to be disregarding the dangerous…
ytc_Ugycb7zkx…
Comment
Letting tech giants in the A.I. industry - who all have dubious safety/ethical records with A.I. and all want the same end goal of A.I. profit - "safety check" each other's models sounds like a recipe for Skynet. Even if their safety standards and biases weren't an issue, the problem is that even if these companies are competitors, they can only succeed if A.I. is accepted and used by the public on a huge scale, so helping A.I. seem safer benefits both sides. It's a Nash Equilibrium where they both benefit the most if they don't try to drag each other down with bad safety checks.
...who thought this up, the FAA?
youtube
2026-04-10T15:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgydsObKgWJzks654EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5MnejrGSbsruraBp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzSKJ26vaEOaA8Jw0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx4SXVsDWX27-pPXkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNR7QnmSlDJXiQn6h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxuugFx3yJzEWXRwF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyX5qqxJAtYwmi2N4R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3uAY5bKrr9M91PB14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgpaoBeFt8SveWsF14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYNiQ3TxczR-tT8Kt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]