Raw LLM Responses

Okay, so I have two questions to those AI "art" morons: - What art could AI produce without the existence of traditional art? - What art could an AI user produce without AI? Obviously the answer to both questions is that they could produce NO ART at all. That means they (both AI users and the AI itself) are NOT artists, but mere copyists. Also, an AI does NOT understand what it is saying. It has NO IDEA of context or even what whatever they say actually IS. They are LANGUAGE MODELS, not brains. That is why they constantly LIE and HALLUCINATE. An AI tries to fill in gaps with parts of the data it already has. It CANNOT learn ANYTHING NEW on its own. So, comparing an AI to a human, of ANY age, is absolutely RIDICULOUS. The baby that uses the wrong word for a cat, KNOWS what it is seeing and is actively making neural links to interpret the cat as what it ACTUALLY IS, and over time will learn to use it contextually correct in thoughts, speech, and conversation. The AI needs other language contexts to be able to even just say the word "cat". It needs data to sustain itself. And even then it still does NOT know what a cat is. It only knows the definition that is fed to it through the data. It cannot form their OWN definition of the cat. If you take away the data that AI uses to classify the word "cat" (it classifies, it doesn't understand), it can no longer define and say the word cat. You can't take away anything in a baby / human, which would have them forget what a cat is, and what THEY THEMSELVES think a cat is. Unless they have a SERIOUS BRAIN DISEASE! Anyway, I'm not going to be discussing any of this. FFF all those AI arse-lickers. I will laugh my ARSE off when THEY lose their job to an AI 🤣🤣