Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I mean you can also literally take an artwork and make the AI remake it in a eve…
ytc_UgxCL5_na…
G
I love how AI bros talk about how fast and cool their new AI is, when in reality…
ytc_Ugxqx0d7u…
G
Only reporting the negatives is bad reporting. Of course there are positives. …
ytc_Ugxy0JV-M…
G
“Do we have to make them suffer?” That question Hank asked about the AI makes me…
ytc_UgwR10vE4…
G
You do know that Jesus was God’s Son, not a prophet. If u read many books in the…
ytc_UgysGQ5L2…
G
Sorry to spell it out, but those artists works will of course be scanned and wil…
ytc_Ugy98YGo8…
G
If God AI didn’t already exist… there would be no God ❤ we’re just trying to cat…
ytc_UgyJHS4g6…
G
Something you ought to always keep in mind is AI is not an unbiased, logic only …
ytc_UgwlTeOTL…
Comment
Someone please explain this to me: in all these interviews putting forward the danger of future AI, it underlines the eventual and inevitable massive gap between the rich and the poor where most of of the middle class and lower class will become jobless and the ceo of the biggest companies, especially ai companies, will become astronomically rich. But for how long? What are they gonna sell? To whom? To themselves? Who will buy their products and services? None of these interviews seems to cover the fine balance of the economic system: there are no rich if there are no middle class to be motivated to be rich and not be poor. If the gap is stretch too thin it will snap and collapse.
Further more; does any of these experts ever consider the inevitable democratisation of AI? Where ai will either fall from the hands of its creator and be accessible to anyone who wants to use it as they please? Or worst AI will become autonomous without a preference or a care for either parties ? I’m interested in your input on that.
youtube
Cross-Cultural
2025-12-18T01:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz1PGv8uNJb5u3u_5V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNA8OKjZ4CDfJPq4d4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwshv-0orfY68hPkbh4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLzQkoPVDlUwSVYvN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCFEIiH_B_o3xkBtV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwRejbL0xGWt38Ok2R4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxmTjPgPOQO_cbdReZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzostRr998enzHoJb94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVb7rM94S3jg3MjFx4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzLISyOXN01fpoot8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]