Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Thanks for your comment! It really is fascinating how AI, like Sophia, engages i…
ytr_Ugwr-AqBX…
G
google has capacity to lose more and play the long game. but a bigger competitor…
ytc_Ugzm2ou_q…
G
by the time this could even hypothetically poison enough of the world's images t…
ytc_UgwJjjJUe…
G
I’m going to cry, I’m a t33nager(so the ai doesn’t flag me) and my main talents …
ytc_UgwJmzAEZ…
G
I feel Musk has a moral compass. This guest only knows Musk through the media an…
ytc_Ugyj4pw3W…
G
Let me talk about the visualization power and skills.
From 2013
I had this...
…
ytc_UgyeLGPbu…
G
in my opinion they gonna think they are smarter and dont need us eventually....w…
ytc_Ugw95Kev7…
G
Integration is something the machine(s) want this as well as organics = symbiosi…
ytc_UgweQGiRy…
Comment
OpenAI just needs to reference the controversy with Musk's Grok. It was clearly publicly decided that AI output was the product, and responsibility, of the AI/company and not the source materials "owner". If the punishments are the Ai's/companies then so are the rewards.
The true problem lies with either ruling on this subject. Both options would send the current Ai market into chaos. If they rule the output is *not* original or unique then suddenly that puts the makers of the content the Ai was trained on liable for what Ai spits out, because it is "just" a reproduction of their work, no matter what form it took. If it is ruled the other way, Ai crashes and a huge sector of the economy vanishes overnight.
Either ruling would be unprecedented chaos. I anticipate this case to be settled so that a ruling is never reached. Leaving the question, at least officially, unanswered.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2026-04-15T09:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxamUxoV7xAGSn4c9p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQvrzmAYOmZNS2kdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQjZo509jN7CrJk5h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxY1ndoiW4xrAD-9IV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxKwEU9n-7MqraomEV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-kvdf2U56rJ4551p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVXdZ17kzO1vDUm1B4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZqAMUpucMGMDmUap4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIH_OsgG9IaCRMIGh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDow8uK1cKlEpBgkN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]