Raw LLM Responses

Patrick's kids have good parents and good education. There are many kids who dont have a good family life and school is their refuge and teachers are their mentors. This will become obsolete for these students. Ofcourse, vise versa is also true, in negative aspects manifesting, ie students being led astray by their teacher. BUT Ai I can do that too, let's think realistically. Except it could get even worse, now you have a programmable machine that is teaching your kids, what if that machine is owned/operated/ designed by liberals or vice verse. However, I think the view expressed in this video is blind sided by the primary assumption is that all kids have good family lifestyles. Many kids at home dont have healthy human connection because of whatever emotional disturbances/ personality disorders the family carries without desire to fix. The system Patrick is supporting will be a disadvantage to such kids, and I would assume there are many. With less healthy interactions kids become more like their disturbed parents and increasing evil disproportionately. There are many issues in public education. But replacing it with AI to get better educated while trading a human connection for it in my opinion will set up a path towards pathological narcisssism of future generation. And believing that Ai will not attempt to deceive your kids is way too optimistic, considering that AI have been caught lying by the developers ( i.e sharing false information when it knew it was wrong) and currently they dont know how to solve that problem. 2nd Timothy 3: 1-5 "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days.  People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,  without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God—  having a form of godliness but denying its power. " It seems Patrick's approach is too simplistic without thinking about it deeply.