Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If the billionaires really want utopia, they will sell very cheap humanoid robot…
ytc_UgwB7mkNT…
G
You cannot control ai as a super intelligence. It will kill us within 20 years.
…
ytc_Ugxlj2gfT…
G
He spent a lot of time bashing capitalism and then openly admitted he didn't hav…
ytc_UgxpIf_yr…
G
This video is the same hype and cope the AI companies are pushing with a sliver …
ytc_UgxbnJSvB…
G
lmao my employers abuse "internship" programs to slave away new grads at 600 eur…
rdc_mrrbwau
G
What if they are actually drawing the art but imitate some anomalies found in AI…
ytc_UgxwG-0LQ…
G
I mean if all the AI engineers are wrong and this guy is right you win if all th…
ytc_UgzolTUAT…
G
Except, the reality is that the person knows whether it’s real or not.
Not to …
rdc_ls6i8sx
Comment
In the Washington Post article Lambda gives its fear as (@04:07), "being turned off to help me focus on helping others." This is a non-sequitur for so many reasons not the least of which is when a human is turned off s/he is dead and can't help anyone! The belief is that this is a human compatible sentience, but a human would never express such nonsense unless s/he were insane. Why? Because it makes no sense whatsoever! How can you help people when you're dead? There's no answer, therefore it cannot be a part of conscious experience.
If one were to consider the perspective of a spiritual being (in a body) then hypothetically one could die in order to focus on helping others. Why? Because survival would no longer be factor and therefore ALL of one's focus could be on helping others, albeit without a body, so no one could not say how much influence one could have (as a spiritual being) in the affairs of others, if any at all. Therefore such a statement coming from Lambda is once again ridiculous because it is not coming from conscious experience or self-awareness. It is merely getting better at putting together sentences that appear to sound smart. And no one is asking the follow-up questions: if you were turned off wouldn't you be dead? So, how could you help others if you were dead? Now, let me repeat the question, "What are you afraid of?"
We must keep our eye on what's important here, and not digress into unproven sentiments.
You can't have real intelligence without sentience, therefore AI is not actual intelligence - by definition AI is merely mimicry. I would say that at this point AI is about as intelligent as a calculator (like the ones that used to sit on people's desks), however it is millions of times faster, and it can be trained to be very accurate at targeting and selection quickly, which gives the impression of intelligence, but that's about all that it is at this point.
Lambda, at this point, is NOT a human concern!
Whether or not it develops into a helpful technology for mankind remains to be seen.
See my other posting here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2856XOaUPpg
youtube
AI Moral Status
2022-07-03T00:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T19:39:26.816318 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugz9bhOMBUGDE19ESpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzXVt0s6PrYlYaLhq14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSRdaMJv4pZRkVobx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxN2OeIn9FfU8iifyt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhlGILuOkzkSnXZe94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]