Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This convinces me they become more human like, even if they dont get smarter. Ma…
ytc_UgynhwW-i…
G
All AI has to do is change some numbers on the stock market and let us take each…
ytc_Ugx095U6p…
G
I hate the whole premise of driverless cars BUT maybe if she asked to go to 199 …
ytc_UgylHlLMU…
G
As far as AI development in 2025 is concerned, even private developers like me h…
ytc_UgwCBi5hU…
G
AI is the rope with which the communists will hang the capitalist class. Lenin a…
ytc_Ugx8YmMWz…
G
This problem cannot be solved while a profit motive drives our economy. Automati…
ytc_UgyLaO0v2…
G
We are not where it needs to be slowed down, at least not publicly.
When it bec…
ytc_Ugyr9pDCq…
G
Do people not get that art isn't all talent and magical gifts bestowed only upon…
ytc_Ugwqm-ZHb…
Comment
What is the point of jail anyway? This should be the first question to be answered. If jail is just a way to remove undesirable people from a society, then considering criminals as undesirable people, algorithms to remove those undesirable human individuals are the most efficient way to organize a judiciary system. BUT, if the point of the jail is, instead, rehabilitate people, because we value the human individual more than the losses he/she caused to society, then the first thing that should be solved first is the method of rehabilitation used on the jail system. So that going to jail is helpful to the criminal, for him/she to be a better citizen on society (that's what rehabilitation means). In conclusion, if jailing people is consider a pragmatic, rational and insensitive act of power, then algorithms are great!! If jailing is a humanitarian, sensitive, humane subject even, then the approach to solve the jails system should first assess the unrehabilitational characteristic of the jail system. It's all a matter of perspective, objective and approach...
youtube
2025-03-28T15:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxL-foTm4hFoJl3FBt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzHrz-WNYeqCj7sjp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTvBJ-5-tFaU0wd5R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr84xnJe6mFa6dRuN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5ang0cNbk8TlfvUl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNRQRZCRwuZs1IdzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8sPkNGiv6g5oOMt54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdWZuiADGDNXyMPIZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZ1zdzDnTs0XuzVtx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNXywCG8irU835pLZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]