Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Something like 8 countries have a military presence in Africa. France probably b…
rdc_et7rsh0
G
I tell my mom I love her everyday fortunately.
Also.. dosent the guy just like …
ytc_UgwDmb0b0…
G
YouTube algorithm, (irony) suggested this after I watched Karen on Hassan Minhaj…
ytc_UgxZ5bBYB…
G
The ironic part is people believe this guy even though he's using the phone. Tha…
ytc_UgyiZpdki…
G
Unfortunately, this issue isn't going to be determined by law. That's the proble…
ytc_UgyJdnHjq…
G
Sure, AI isn't fully replacing software engineers, however it will significantly…
ytc_UgzwFDCcf…
G
@milesthecaterpillarৎBy that metric you should stop using every video hosting w…
ytr_Ugy160U51…
G
👴🏻- for a second there I thought AI was no good but I approve of this 🙏🏻🕊🪕🤜🏻💥👴🏿🩸…
ytr_UgxS1saVg…
Comment
What is the point of jail anyway? This should be the first question to be answered. If jail is just a way to remove undesirable people from a society, then considering criminals as undesirable people, algorithms to remove those undesirable human individuals are the most efficient way to organize a judiciary system. BUT, if the point of the jail is, instead, rehabilitate people, because we value the human individual more than the losses he/she caused to society, then the first thing that should be solved first is the method of rehabilitation used on the jail system. So that going to jail is helpful to the criminal, for him/she to be a better citizen on society (that's what rehabilitation means). In conclusion, if jailing people is consider a pragmatic, rational and insensitive act of power, then algorithms are great!! If jailing is a humanitarian, sensitive, humane subject even, then the approach to solve the jails system should first assess the unrehabilitational characteristic of the jail system. It's all a matter of perspective, objective and approach...
youtube
2025-03-28T15:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxL-foTm4hFoJl3FBt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyzHrz-WNYeqCj7sjp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTvBJ-5-tFaU0wd5R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr84xnJe6mFa6dRuN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5ang0cNbk8TlfvUl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxNRQRZCRwuZs1IdzZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz8sPkNGiv6g5oOMt54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdWZuiADGDNXyMPIZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzZ1zdzDnTs0XuzVtx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNXywCG8irU835pLZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"}
]