Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Let's be real about it. The web already gives an AI all the keys to be harmful. … ytc_UgxBe0m_i… G Who the hell told them you were born being able to draw 😭 what a dumbass thats l… ytc_UgxRrZuX1… G 1:03 nice to hear that the guy from Stanley Parable has had his voice cloned. No… ytc_UgxEPal8N… G What a childish question. EVERYTHING has potential to cause harm, from the WATER… rdc_oi0mvms G It's so ironic that I got an ad for Adobe generative AI in this video.. =_= *sig… ytc_UgwfiAy6q… G This will happen to most of us soon no matter the job AI will takeover everythin… ytc_Ugwvfa4d6… G Thank you for your presentation. AI has affected my critical thinking so much in… ytc_UgzEO6EYM… G 55:38 That's not at all what President Trump's end game is. He hasn't said anyth… ytc_UgxIBDoGf…

Comment

14:06 I'd actually give a different response here. As bad an artist as Jackson Pollick is, at least he's an artist. The algorithm that made the fantasy landscape (and the fake Pollick) isn't, by definition an artist. Hence the works of Pollick, by default definition, has more artistic value than anything the AI spits out. The issue is the dude in the video tried to do a gotcha by mixing up the question. He asked which had more artistic value, and then showed a known bad artist while showing a pretty looking landscape generated by AI. If he had asked which is better looking, he might've gotten more artists saying that the AI landscape was prettier, it he didn't. He asked a bunch of artists which had more value, and so they chose the one they thought had at least been made by a human. Then he changed the question with his gotcha by saying "see it was actually AI and you couldn't tell". The thing is, those artists probably answered on principle. They didn't say they LIKED Polluck's supposed piece, they just assumed that it was one of his works (again because his works are so shit) that even an AI recreation was unidentifiable, and so just chose the one they thought was made by a human.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-12-02T02:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq4_e66aT17EmXfl54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsPr7nSms_iwXxoQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0nBP3D3yin9AlwsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxhqPq78Z0etQ9Q1V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXBmGwrkktKLrdwtp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbwgPXwIPPZN8wuoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfLMwSIvkY0oC7uIR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEvP04hmIzX7uWUwd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTBiVio59QBK6MTcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZlvROiPrL_PRWbHZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses