Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Artists: no filter… can draw “artists” pregnant “Artists”: Has to use AI to dra… ytc_UgwDIu4aQ… G o1's Chain of Thought: **Thinking** **Dropping a tab** I'm dropping 400μg of … rdc_m010g0v G Okay Sis, first off thank you for doing all you do. I keep hearing this phrase “… ytc_UgwthIqXy… G One of the first things people are going to use these for is sex. I give it 50 y… ytc_UgzwvjYp9… G If AI being trained on artwork is "stealing" it, then so is a human seeing it an… ytr_Ugzyzl_ii… G Robot is like "All you have to do is hit my power button, if you can get to it.,… ytc_Ugw4cd0u7… G You say socialist propaganda as if that's a bad thing? Do you prefer capitalist… rdc_f9it5it G More people will live if AI is used to diagnose. This is coming from an RN… ytc_Ugze9U10Z…

Comment

14:06 I'd actually give a different response here. As bad an artist as Jackson Pollick is, at least he's an artist. The algorithm that made the fantasy landscape (and the fake Pollick) isn't, by definition an artist. Hence the works of Pollick, by default definition, has more artistic value than anything the AI spits out. The issue is the dude in the video tried to do a gotcha by mixing up the question. He asked which had more artistic value, and then showed a known bad artist while showing a pretty looking landscape generated by AI. If he had asked which is better looking, he might've gotten more artists saying that the AI landscape was prettier, it he didn't. He asked a bunch of artists which had more value, and so they chose the one they thought had at least been made by a human. Then he changed the question with his gotcha by saying "see it was actually AI and you couldn't tell". The thing is, those artists probably answered on principle. They didn't say they LIKED Polluck's supposed piece, they just assumed that it was one of his works (again because his works are so shit) that even an AI recreation was unidentifiable, and so just chose the one they thought was made by a human.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-12-02T02:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq4_e66aT17EmXfl54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsPr7nSms_iwXxoQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0nBP3D3yin9AlwsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxhqPq78Z0etQ9Q1V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXBmGwrkktKLrdwtp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbwgPXwIPPZN8wuoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfLMwSIvkY0oC7uIR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEvP04hmIzX7uWUwd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTBiVio59QBK6MTcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZlvROiPrL_PRWbHZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses