Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
god damn it i wish i became an ai so when people asked me to draw for them i wou…
ytc_UgzL28wwv…
G
I got a commercial for this video that was about using a AI lawyer if uve been i…
ytc_UgyJL4nIp…
G
So we need dedicated power stations AND theres nonturning back once this comes..…
ytc_Ugx4RSX2R…
G
Ah yes having the computer do all the work for me while I type words and it rips…
ytr_UgwJDFQwD…
G
While i think this guy is a genius, this is an awful analogy.
a.) Your dog know…
ytc_Ugy3ILFV0…
G
I’ve been coding for 10+ years and I guarantee you it’s revolutionary.
1. Make …
rdc_mlgid0u
G
@cheyenne9362 That would be funny let that robot teach the inner-city high schoo…
ytr_UgxjL2hbN…
G
From my understanding, most LLM (chatbots) use websites (created by humans) to f…
ytc_Ugx4C5qpM…
Comment
48:11 “Predicting data that humans created often requires you to be smarter than the humans that created it” seems either disingenuous or wrong to me, given that we are asking of an AI that it produces an output that fits a range of responses that we seem as acceptable, performed in such a way where it specifically doesn’t need to understand any component parts or anything at all, it simply has to conjure something that sounds reasonable. Extrapolating theories from a set of data is difficult, but popular word selection from aggregates of other extrapolation is bullshitting, not extrapolating. Creating a prediction in this way doesn’t require that one understands anything at all, I’m reminded of the “Chinese translation box” thought experiment, where someone has a set of symbols and instructions to give certain symbols out of the box when they receive other symbols into it- in this way the box could seem to speak a language even when the thinker in the box knows nothing about it.
My point is- it’s not a sign of intelligence that it is “predicting human data” because that could be done without any of the processes that we would ascribe to intelligence or being smart.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-11-17T18:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzygqCafbRLsp9Xr194AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugywgk6du9hbvl99LO94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyl3QgrWOTtl6hKe3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPh9ySYWWVptvVjrF4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyxM9y89cm6W4WC954AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4E7InsIdi_3w7hNB4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwyn9yX1AMEJtOc7114AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9JSmCZTyTbp2N4NZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyfrNfhl5S1I770on14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmRXUeGPtQkWYsN-p4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]