Raw LLM Responses

Hold on Hold on Hold on there... 03:20 talks about Open AI vs Scarlett Johannsen it has not been officially confirmed it was her voice, the argument is that it is a voice that "earely" resounds similar to her own, but openAI have maintained it is another voice actresses voice so to state that Open AI used Scarlett Johannsen's voice as a fact is premature and incorrect as it stands at the moment. It is being looked into but it has not concluded on whether it is her voice or not. For those who aren't familiar with this story, the actress was approached to use her voice, she refused, they came to her 2 days prior to Open AI going public with GPT4O and she didnt have chance to respond, then this scandall has emerged. I would anticipate that were it is Scarlett Johannsen's voice then there will be lawsuits and compensation, there will be students taught on ethics and morality and use this as an example of a AI scandall, in a similar way to how we (as I am an AI Masters Student) were taught about Clearview AIs unethical use of web scrapping images and allowing the general public to track people from an image. As it stands OpenAI need to substantiate their claims that another voice actress was used, if that is then proven in court or to her lawyers (solicitors) then that's the end of it and they can continue using "Sky" as the voice, regardless of it resembling her own voice, it was done for marketing purposes because she voiced the female AI assistant in the movie HER (2013) so it creates a lot of media attention on something that was once science fiction 11 yrs ago is now science fact. If it turns out her voice was not used, then I would imagine that might become a regrettable moment for Scarlett Johansen comparable to the Kodak moment in which it developed the digital camera but didn't act on it.