Raw LLM Responses

the biggest question most people i think have about ai, that no one seems to be answering, is what occupational fields will go first. will it be the highest paying and most skilled like engineers and programmers and scientists or will it be drivers of various vehicles, or soldiers, or labor. its seems like the pace of self driving tech is going to fast that that might be the first industry to fall to ai, but also, maybe a close second, is basically anything to do with a computer like your guest stated. but also, its seems that companies, will have a higher incentive to replace their highest paid/ most skilled employees because it reduces cost of operating the most. but at the same time, couple years ago i witnessed bimbo bakeries in utah, replace some labor with robotics. so perhaps factory workers will be one of the first professions to go as well.... maybe they all go very quickly. im guessing, that the last jobs to go, will perhaps be labor instensive jobs where the robotics technology isnt yet affordable or available for the position. the least incentive to replace a person with a robot would be where the cheapest human labor is, or am i wrong? and regardless of how it happens, wont the people, or are massively poor and destitute, wont they just barter between themselves and grow their own food and essentially become self sufficient or die? because all though we constantly hear from the ai and utopia fanatics about the age of prosperity, their own theory of how to get there, seems to me to be a temporary wealth gap that will economically destroy the livelihoods of almost all. and at the same time, the only way their "utopia" arrives is in a world where ai is dominant, and if people want food and water, they will have to submit to the system, which can only be a socialist type of world government. resdistribution of wealth, and they will likely only give away enough for the people to survive, for many reasons like greed or preserve power. and even aside from all the doomsday theories of ai taking over the world, i think whats more likely, at least in the shorter term, is a handful of individuals, who control ai and the robot armies, will become the rulers of the world, and if so, i think we all know deep down that that regime, even if it professes peace and prosperity, will be malicious in nature, and will likely desire to wipe out the world population because everyone is a threat to them, not individually, but the people as a whole. and i think ai would advise this regime to do this. wild theor right? except many of the elites having already been planning such things and have openly told the world this. in addition, "you will own nothing and be happy", likely refers to this world, and perhaps suggest that when humans integrate with ai, via a chip or whatever it is, that the very thing that makes us human, will be replaced by ai. ai will or will have the ability to mess with our mind/ body, perhaps making us something like a zombie, where we might eat and drink and enjoy those things, but have no love in hearts, no compassion, no conscience telling us what is right and what is wrong. in other words, (i am a christian), ai would replace God who is in us. the book of revelation speaks of a day when people will throw their gold and silver into the streets, a day where no one will be able to buy or sell unless they have the mark in their hand of forehead. and those that receive the mark cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. if they cannot enter heaven, then the mark is more than just a piece of metal, it is an allegiance to a power (satan) different from God, which would explain the loss of our conscience or whatever you call the x factor that makes us human and have compassiom an such. brandon biggs shared a vision of the tribulation, and he saw those that wouldnt receive the mark to be beheaded, and those that did take it, they seemed lifeless. for example, a mother takes the mark cause she doesnt want her children to die, she receives it, is still alive, but like lifeless as well, because then perhaps her husband would be beheaded for not taking it and she would have no emotion after watching her husband beheaded in front of her, because something changed when she took the mark. what i hope people realize, is that putting ai into their bodies, something we dont or wont perhaps have control of, seems to me like a bad idea. but what decision will people make faced with a beheading or starvation or poverty or whatever as the apparent alternative. podcasters are already joking about this, and most of them say they would get it. the bible says you cannot serve two masters. it says that the body, is a holy vessel to God, that we are to be holy as He is holy, thus making (through Christ) a holy vessel for the Holy Spirit. so having something else dwelling in us, whether it be ai, or a demonic spirit, contradicts God's will for everyone. what i find unbearably depressing, is that more people are concerned with ai, then they are concerned with what this tech revolution is leading us to, which is global totalitarianism. a global police state, which seems required to be in place for certain prophecies the bible has predicted, (such as the mark of the beast). which means, the anti christ is likely already upon the earth, and will take the helm when the system is in place and ready for him....imagine radical islam, mixed with an ai police state... could be wrong, but i think this is what the bible predicts. and if you study it, you will likely come to the same or similar conclusion.