Raw LLM Responses

Considering that AI images aren't art, it can't replace artists. It just regurgitates stolen work. It's just an excuse not to pay artists. And then the sealions show up and start asking bad faith questions like "Why is that bad? Why should someone have to pay you to draw?" As if there aren't objective skills involved, and in any other industry, you're paid for executing your skills. And you're not getting it free. You're just paying a company to steal. Nothing new comes from it. They just want to write a prompt and have images arrive. That's placing an order, or executing a search, not creating. You didn't actually do anything, especially create art, since there's no art here. And the bs about accessibility is crap. Nothing about disability requires you to steal. Back in the day Polio patients in iron lungs painted with the brush in their mouth. Humans can be creative and have disabilities at the same time and they don't need to steal. It doesn't matter how technically accurate it gets, I will not waste my time watching or reading something no one bothered to make. Such an insulting notion and a colossal waste of time, energy and resources. AI can be useful. But it can't make art. It needs to stay in its lane, and that is doing work that people don't want to do to allow us more time to do what we do want to do.