Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Nah, this isn't a concern. All these guys just hype the horror story potential o…
ytc_UgxHrNU_V…
G
You never smile while putting water inside of a glass bottle so I don’t know why…
ytc_Ugzx9gygL…
G
Here's the thing: we've plateaued. There is no real growth anymore: just increme…
ytc_UgxMzdM1q…
G
the scariest part about the deep fakes and stuff like it is they aren't just tar…
ytc_Ugw8X19oM…
G
Amazing that this is getting downvoted. If you haven’t used an AI coding tool in…
rdc_n9re9tx
G
What would be the real purpose of this? Can anyone tell me? Why would anyone wan…
ytc_UgweMzysq…
G
what you said about ChatGPT and everything was just spot on you are not just a g…
ytc_Ugz0CErlT…
G
Teach are children that they are living in a post answer-based economy, that the…
ytc_Ugz_0CkoY…
Comment
The video is fake! Each attentive human driver
driver could have prevented the women's death.
It is simple math:
low beam head lights have a range of at least 150feet (60m).
In addition there is stray light from street lamps. The women has been in the middle of the road when she became visible. This means at a speed of 38mph (17m/s) the time from the women becoming visible to the impact is approximately 3.5s. In the video this duration is just over a second. Car stopping distance including "thinking time used in The Highway Code" at 38mph is 110 feet.
Conclusion:
1. With a human driver, the lady would be alive.
2. The video is manipulated or of such a low quality that it actually hides the most important details.
3. Uber's automated car completely failed and its safety is worse than a human driven car.
We can only speculate if the video has been purposely edited or whether it is just the bad quality; why there is no better video available from such a high tech car;
why the police officer made such a bold statement based on such a weak evidence, blaming the victim.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2018-03-25T12:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxwGXbN23TdgmZG_pR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgylSrf2BiYb56w1zHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwd4sJnL5aa2uTFGFl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyjJAlhl41P08qaCUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz21zp6Sv9W0289naZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]