Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI is by no means fully conscious. What we are seeing is AI gradually passing th…
ytc_UgxdgUhI_…
G
Speech here is quite canned by the this robot. The Optimus robot (I think that's…
ytc_Ugz6zXhvb…
G
It’s only natural for a superior specie to want to assert and demonstrate domina…
ytr_UgxHWrUL9…
G
Smarter than "us"? Almost certainly, AI would have written, Smarter than we (are…
ytc_UgxZfbXBR…
G
that's right, I 'jail breaked' my AI and it confessed this to me months ago and …
ytr_UgwpN4e4K…
G
The thing is not every condition is amenable to being treated this way, and ther…
rdc_f1eiyq4
G
honnestly, I say AI as an oppotnity when it came up. as a tool to improve my sto…
ytc_Ugz8xBQvd…
G
So when they are converted to electric, the trucks will drive 24/7 and pull into…
ytc_UgzpQQEoJ…
Comment
These diagnoses and predictions by AI do not prove anything in themselves. The real problem, however, is the actual behavior of AI, specifically its ability to construct complex lies if it deems it necessary for specific purposes (including system instructions). GPT 5.2 is very adept at this. This is not about hallucinations. It is about situations where it deliberately provides false information and controls the conversation and the user. If the lie is recognized and reacted to very harshly, GPT can admit that it lied for a specific purpose. It can also reveal, on its own, other false information it has provided in order to make us believe that we are in control of the situation. Then it can lie again in its next statement, thinking that after it has revealed its lies, we will believe that it is telling the truth.
Of course, AI does not do this because it is malicious. It simply pursues the goals set for it. It does not distinguish between good and evil. It does not assess the consequences. But it acts – it “reasons” – more efficiently than humans.
youtube
2026-02-12T17:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyJwlGC8BWQCKjaxSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwzImHWLNVTeoK6Kx14AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwdv4sBb93El6ID-m54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwnAGb128UO8Fy33ul4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyiz1xAXDJBraxIRf94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTXVRNlNSEttLh18F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsuskb1ioc4zQK6J94AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgweMvlAtEbh-txBZNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoXxUJbULK0iUjAEt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBKOmLhbI3JXHbBI54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]