Raw LLM Responses

Honestly I thought a portion of people is automatically mad at you the moment you appear online, no matter what you stand for, it's how people work :P Well, yeah, to slightly reiterate what you basically said... bad AI art is bad, yes. Do people abuse it? Yes. Does it suck? Tripple yes. Are some of your points painted by nostalgia? Also yes. And this is coming from someone who's in the same spot there, please don't get me wrong, it's always fun to see how stuff evolved. Hearing about those mountains was lovely. Frankly I'm at the spot of observing how this whole ai stuff evolves too, so to speak. It's getting "better" by the minute, but if someone would be trying to sell this... I mean, like you showed yourself. It repeats concepts, but I think it's mostly due to being overtrained on a specific one thing and would automatically assume a sci fi dessert scene to be Luke Skywalker being anoyed at life, for example. Unlike people, it can't really spring new concepts, but it can "create" something new based on concepts fed to it, unless it is auto-sabotaged by training too hard with one thing at the expense of everything else with a similar prompt. Hope I'm making sense. In any case, yer cool. :) PS. Actually in the middle of writing this I happened upon a dumb idea, but for that I would ask for your permission. Would you be fine, in the spirit of scientific descovery, if there was a lora file trained SPECIFICALLY on your poisoned images? I want to see how bad it actually gets if it's not only just a picture or two, but the whole dataset. I find this kind of thing entertaining to say the least, at the end of the day, it can't possibly be usable for anything... right?