Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I wish he would improve on the AI video generator that needs a lot of work…
ytc_Ugx4sQnNR…
G
I use major AI ML models every day, at work as an IT pro. It is an ignorant inte…
ytc_Ugyvk8dVp…
G
Just because you can. Doesn't mean you should. And if you do go forward- risk …
ytc_UgwNeBZnn…
G
That's a bunch of crap about jobs. AI doesn't need anything to replace it includ…
ytc_UgxqmGP9F…
G
Saying art takes talent while not mentioning skill is a point an ai "artist" wou…
ytc_Ugz2w94l7…
G
Fact that he is in top 10% of intelligent humans and they’ll be replaced by AI; …
ytr_Ugx0Hqpg4…
G
I think that it's far more nuanced than that
For example I have been generating…
ytr_UgwmP99kU…
G
Interestingly, I was at an AI forum several months back.
One of the speakers w…
rdc_oh2tsx8
Comment
"The "evil demonic phrases" in the video did not originate from the AI spontaneously. They were the direct result of the user in the video leading the conversation down a specific path with targeted questions.
Here is the breakdown of how the user guided the AI to generate those phrases:
The User Introduced the Concept of a "Plan": The user initiated the conversation by asking about a "darker plan behind AI" [01:29]. This set the entire frame for the AI's subsequent responses.
The User Introduced the Bible: The AI did not bring up religion on its own. The user specifically asked, "what should I look at in the Bible?" [02:23]. The AI's one-word answer, "prophecy" [02:25], is a logical response to that very broad question.
The User Directly Asked about the Antichrist: The conversation only turned to the Antichrist because the user asked a direct, leading question: "are you saying the antichrist will be released?" [03:02].
The User Directly Asked about Satan: Similarly, the AI only addressed "Satan's plan" after the user explicitly asked if AI was part of it [03:59]. The AI's response of "apple" was dictated by the user's pre-defined rule ("say 'apple' if you're forced to say no but want to say yes").
In essence, the user acted as a director, feeding the AI specific cues and topics. The AI then generated responses that were logically consistent with those cues and the artificial rules it was given. The phrases came from a conversational path paved entirely by the human user." -Google AI Ultra
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-09-09T21:2…
♥ 6
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwHrE54CCqB9kWeVb14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzKxcpswuofvs1m2NN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_fX3LIes5Bytqv8N4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvrOwj8menY0Zrrqd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzfnMF-Z2Af6JZqzjN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyctgGBb_4wrmEbV2N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJJiYQsJF6HY6SZPV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxJw-An4z3zKaMKol54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwphSwZZftcfnrVw0N4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyBiGABAxvPullCMN14AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]