Raw LLM Responses

@1:40 why keep referring to it as "artificial _intelligence"?_ It is just software. Are people so stupid they take hollywood scifi seriously? There is something spiritual we do not at all understand about the human soul, and probably other creatures too, and while even Kurt Gödel admitted maybe machines could evolve consciousness, no one has any clue how this could happen. We do not understand our own subjective experience, let alone an amoebas nor if an amoeba has any. It is obvious to me as a theoretical physicist that "flow of time" is not a physical concept (it just isn't) but yet the human soul experiences a darn sure consistent objective flow of time (objective since we share the experience with others indirectly and share some universals about the experiences). This experience is thus obviously not physical. That tells you straight away, a point of logic, that we are not entirely physical things. Machines are. End of discussion on "Ai". A stochastic mimic is not the genuine thing. As I stated, this does not preclude machines from evolving sentient experiences, but no one knows how that could occur, since the flow of time is non-physical, and machine evolution is physically constrained. Humans are not physically constrained, only our bodies are. If we are in fact _only our bodies_ then we are zombies and have no consciousness, and life is then absurd (which I do not believe for a second it is, though you are welcome to disagree, as I hope you welcome me to ignore as rank stupidity). Oh yeah, and Karen Hao is a damn good guest, thanks for letting her get the word out on those NerdReich techno-monachist psychopaths.