Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Tired of the "automation won't replace humans, but work with them" nonsense. Ent…
ytc_Ugx_0eWvH…
G
I would prefer humans do the art and machines wash dishes. I think some of the A…
ytc_UgxzGDmo8…
G
Will AI agents or systems or whatever you want to call them, ever be competing w…
ytc_UgyIo9pPP…
G
The robot realized it didn't grab a vegetable, so it turned him into a vegetable…
ytc_UgxYXwUP9…
G
Now remember.... The machine doesn't understand what it itself is saying. There …
ytc_UgzM7XQSB…
G
@atulkumar943 AI is just an another tool,…yea but a ‘powerful one’ , rather than…
ytr_UgxocVdjw…
G
We're developing robots too fast. We need to make them not be able to overthrow …
ytc_UgyNAksLa…
G
I've been doing the designer thing for the last 15 years, and it's wild how ever…
ytc_Ugwphd9Ye…
Comment
Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics are a set of rules designed to govern the behavior of robots in his science fiction stories: 1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm; 2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law; 3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. These laws, first introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", have become a foundational concept in the field of robotics and science fiction.
Here's a breakdown of each law:
1. First Law:
This is the most important law, prioritizing the safety of humans. A robot must not intentionally harm a human or allow a human to be harmed due to the robot's inaction.
2. Second Law:
This law establishes that robots should obey human commands, with the caveat that these commands must not contradict the First Law.
3. Third Law:
This law dictates that a robot should protect its own existence, but only as long as doing so doesn't violate the First or Second Law. In other words, a robot's self-preservation is secondary to the safety of humans and obeying their commands.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-06-16T11:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyPaudX0VKOtSBdarN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyLHY0nCGHMlpU3zM54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAru9ozhl7WWrpvrl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0-ZhZl96LGV-GqFV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyNNAFsz0saNWt9u-R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvgyDGo5HUMS9eP0V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_FfVzpnmcm5oXkOZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwyshk3KrBZkbfNETF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx-YuRpi8hxCUs5dKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzanz6SU_KEfB52SC14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"}
]