Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Lots of logical fallacies here, the easiest to pick out are the following
Nirva…
ytc_UgzA9WPvZ…
G
i found out from a school teacher they been using playground ai its straight BS …
ytc_UgwXn1kZV…
G
If you ask an AI to behave a certain way, why would you expect it to do anything…
ytc_Ugwx3Qcsw…
G
PSA: Passive aggressive narcissists exist in both human & AI form. So don’t pay …
ytc_UgzWp8Uoz…
G
I'm a retired senior software engineer, and only recently tried Ai for coding. P…
ytc_UgzzVCTEg…
G
Comedian (the banana taped to a wall) is in itself a mockery of talentless slop …
ytc_UgwCBHpUC…
G
What does one robot says to another when they are undergoing an operation? I hav…
ytc_Ugxm4kZsU…
G
7:00 funny he uses communists as his dumb hur dur cult, when the USSR was basica…
ytc_UgwaRqSca…
Comment
They are genuinely building a utopia. AI will, if taken to it's logical conclusion, do away with basic scarcity. Obviously it's not guaranteed, and the structure of that society is variable, but the technology at least makes such a post-scarcity society possible. If that society was fully realised this wouldn't even be an issue for the most part, since artists would not be financially dependent on their works and could contribute to the training data as a hobby. Copyright wouldn't even need to exist.
That is probably how they (the AI devs solar mentions) justify it, and personally I am inclined to agree with them. However even if they successfully develop the tech, and we eventually reach such a "utopia" (I think the term is misleading because it suggests a perfect society when really it's more like an "easy" or "comfortable" society, post basic-scarcity is probably the best term), the transition toward such a society would likely be brutal. It would involve the virtual collapse of an economic system that has more or less existed for all of human history.
youtube
2023-02-13T21:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzuRIXyAaXAS2IOHtd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyKJs3OpOM0qd4rWYF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwRyYPdMj4dc48vV2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyDtmyNn_UGMiu9cW94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyxcw1kj1i2DtvYuf94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtVmEcuC-H2Uo8KqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzbsNXsXtfT57wEDct4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9aGBUW6Cz5yuvC154AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyI_QsOELrvh15zR2J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4EZ6k4qovfj79D2N4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]