Raw LLM Responses

2:58 this is a dumb interpretation of art. Are you not moved by the beauty of nature? If I made up a fake backstory behind an image with a fake artist that doesn’t exist you would be unable to tell that a human didn’t make it and therefore you’re enjoyment of the art would be fake. But you did enjoy it. You can’t retroactively unenjoy the art now that you know the artist is fake. 3:24 this is the bullshit thing English teachers tell you to do when they ask you why the author described a door as red. No actually, the furry hentai I consume does not have a piece of the artist put into it. Not everything has a deeper human meaning or connection. 4:05 Any personality can create any art, so it’s literally untrue that you’re enjoying the art because your friend put a piece of themselves into the art, you’re enjoying the art because you’re biased and want to enjoy things made by your friend. If my friend microwaved me a frozen meal, the meal did not suddenly become better because my friend created art, I’m just using the food as a vessel to enjoy the human connection between my friend. The only difference is you’re not actually making a human connection between you and the artist. You’re just being parasocial. 5:20 Anything can make you feel something. The word r*pe makes me feel something. I don’t have a deep emotional connection to the word r*pe. You’re just describing the function of language, which is to be a medium to transmit ideas or feelings. 5:45 it is valuable, but it is not what defines art. You’re just describing the concept of language. 6:18 this is an insanely dumb point. Whether a human made it or not, doesn’t give it value. Whether you have a connection to the human does. If I wrote the words, “I love you” you would have no emotional response to these words, but if your significant other said that you would have an emotional response. Did the fact that I said it suddenly make it not art? Did I not create something because you didn’t connect with it emotionally? 6:32 I ask again is nature art and is it beautiful? Do I have to believe in a God to think the universe itself is beautiful and is art? 7:07 no you can’t. You cannot see “soul”. And I know this because one day an AI will be powerful enough to create an image of that quality. Simply mathematically speaking, there is nothing that stops an AI from creating an image of this quality, so you absolutely cannot “see the soul” 7:21 OK but you don’t know that? What if I told you that artist was commissioned to redraw the art and soullessly re-drew it in order to get a paycheck? Do you think you can tell the difference between someone who cares and someone who doesn’t in art? And what if it only took them 20 minutes to redraw the art? You cannot see effort and struggle, you’re just using context to imply It’s existence. 7:29 what if the artist put blood sweat and tears into this redraw but they love AI art? Wouldn’t you be sullying all their effort just to confirm your anti-AI bias? 8:55 but you can’t KNOW that wasn’t made by AI😭😭😭! Also something being more unique does not make it more interesting or better. The taste of shit sure is unique, but I’m not gonna eat it. 9:40 OK but you’ve already admitted that simple words are art that can connect people. Why is the prompt itself not art? 9:58 if I use spellcheck after I write a story, is that taking away the art I put into the story? I mean, my spelling mistakes are ME aren’t they? Certainly, you can get a better understanding and conduction to someone if you can see their spelling mistakes. You can get a deeper connection and understanding of me if I leave in all the spelling errors. But it would make the story worse. Words(and art) are supposed to portray something. If you can’t understand what it was trying to portray because it’s hard to read(or the art looks messy and confusing) then it has failed as art. And if you can’t understand what it was trying to portray, then it has succeeded. If you can tell what the prompt was for AI art or what the original image looked like for an AI filter, then you have found the meaning hidden in the art that the creator wanted you to find. 10:10 dumb non-point. Effort does not make something good. Times of artist have spent years trying to portray a story, but their stories aren’t interesting and their drawings look like shit. That makes them a bad artist. 10:22 no he’s not. He’s betraying it as an objective competition where the number of people that like something determine how good it is. Which is how basically everything is determined. sure you need humans to rank the thing, but you don’t need humans to make the thing to determine whether or not the thing is good. We can certainly ranked the colors based on popularity, even though humans didn’t make colors. 10:44 nobody said that you’re putting words in their mouth. I can compare apples and the color blue and determine which is better based off a popularity pole. That does not mean that apples must strive to be the color blue to be better it just needs to be more popular to be better. 10:57 again. Nature. 11:02 yeah. YOU don’t think they want to. And YOU don’t think it’s entertaining. But you don’t decide these things, democracy will decide whether or not people like AI art. 12:00 “from my experience” okay😂. 12:26 again. Nature. Or in this instance, also just soulless work. I am willing to bet my life that you have enjoyed media produced by someone who hated making it, hates everyone that enjoys it, and only made it because they wanted money. And you were none the wiser. 12:35 the meaning is in the prompt. If you’re one of those weirdos that analyze the brush throats to try to derive meaning then you’re wrong. There was never any meeting you were just making it up. The door is sometimes just red because it has to be a color not because the color red symbolize something. 14:17 omg. You cannot genuinely believe that the porn artist cares about the characters they’re drawing whatsoever. Right?? do you think the sweat shop worker cares about the quality of the shoes they made for you? They produced the art because somebody wants it and somebody will pay them for it. They do not care about these characters or about the art. Obviously. 15:04 you were not learning something deep about a YouTuber when you watch their videos. You’re learning exactly what they want you to know, which is usually just the popular opinion and the popular belief. Youtubers are a product like everything else, they want to appeal to as many people as possible so they will often fake their opinions. Do you think you’re learning something deep and meaningful about a politician when you hear their speeches? They’re telling you exactly what you want to hear to get you to vote for them. And Youtubers are telling you exactly what you want to hear to get you to watch them. It’s not real. It is not a “human connection”. Stop being parasocial. 17:12 the exchange of emotion isn’t gone because you’re getting the prompt. And also the exchange of emotion is WAY less important than you think it is. A whole lot of art is made emotionlessly. Solely for profit. It’s still art, and if enough people like it, that makes it good art. 18:17 oh… I get it now.. you genuinely are just parasocial. That’s sad.. sorry if I was ever mean in this comment, now I just feel bad for you.. but no, one-sided relationships are bad. 18:23 it’s sad you think that way.. I’m sure one day you’ll be able to enjoy art without having to feel some deep emotional connection to the creator. I’m prying for you man🙏 21:03 bro could never understand neuro sama. Proof that actually people do like AI, they just hate lazy AI stuff. Because when it’s made lazily it’s usually worse and, you can tell. it’s uninteresting. 22:52 oof, wrong again. The demand for connection has grown, but connection to AI has replaced human connection a lot recently. Now, obviously, I think these AI relationships are worse for your mental health than human relationships. But they are relationships, and they do have value. You can’t just say ”that’s not a real relationship!” Humans are already getting replaced by AI..