Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
UBER is at fault and legally liable. If a person was driving the car, they could be indicted for manslaughter or homicide. Because its a corporation and a robotic car and a fat guy the blame is dispersed, but the point remains that THEY COLLECTIVELY FUCKED UP AND ARE LIABLE AS A LEGAL ENTITY. Engineers are held to a standard, and hold some hold credentials that swear them to uphold public safety, UBER, as their employer absorbs the liability in this case. UBERs Lawyers are worth their weight in gold in this case but it might not be necessary if the public doesn't raise the issue because they are either stupid enough to blame the pedestrian or sychophanic enough to turn a blind eye because they want driverless cars sooner rather than later regardless of how mature the technology is.
youtube AI Harm Incident 2018-04-24T05:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_UgxwGXbN23TdgmZG_pR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgylSrf2BiYb56w1zHh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwd4sJnL5aa2uTFGFl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyjJAlhl41P08qaCUB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugz21zp6Sv9W0289naZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"} ]