Raw LLM Responses

As someone who draws as a hobby, I can *see* the benefit of AI generated work for non-artists as a reference material (along with descriptions for details, changes and whathot) to give to artists so that they can better handle commissions. In fact, this exact thing has happened to be a few times, where a person generated AI pictures, to give to me, so that they can *Pay me*, to draw what they want in my style and to their desire. In fact, they were willing to pay *more* than my normal commission prices for this method of reference giving. Unfortunately, human beings can't all be like this, and the technology absolutely can and has been abused for the wrong reasons that has resulted in the need to poison it. IMO, AI art at best should only be used for non-artists to create references to give to actual artists, to pay them and get something in an easier manner than; "Attempting to make the reference on their own when they've never drawn before" or "Searching for a reference online, which will likely take awhile if they don't already have an artist/image in mind that prompted the commission in the first place". I know for a fact that I'd have an easier time drawing the references when commissioning than searching for them online, but that's because I do have experience drawing.. and I'm really bad at using search engines/sites to find what I want.