Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Summary in detail from "Ask" AI: In this video, Hank Green interviews Nate Soare…
ytc_UgyQBf2-y…
G
@rosevee35 Copyright law doesn't protect style or ideas—only specific expression…
ytr_UgzCqX3B8…
G
There’s a fundamental contradiction in how elites operate today. They advocate f…
ytc_Ugy3N6j7b…
G
Honestly, I think that "Strong AI" would be considered a new species. The first …
ytc_Ugi1lhQIl…
G
It's impossible to communicate with artists who use AI. I guess the only option …
ytc_UgwmUzgWS…
G
Because the AI stocks are the only thing hiding the fact that we are in a recess…
rdc_nui5irm
G
No...NO,NO,NO,N - look ai is bad I hate it and it's ruining the lives of animato…
ytc_Ugy5Gzcbm…
G
It’s 2025 and we’ve got reasoning models like GPT-5 and DeepSeek R1 actually con…
ytc_UgxOmpzhi…
Comment
Don’t fall for these doomsday claims — none of this is backed by real data.
There is no AGI today, no superintelligence, and zero evidence that 99% of jobs will disappear by 2030. No report from the OECD, IMF, World Bank or ILO supports anything close to that. Even the most aggressive studies talk about automation of 20–30% of tasks, not entire jobs.
The “2045 Singularity” is an old speculative theory from twenty years ago, never proven and widely disputed by the scientific community.
Current AI has no real-world agency, no autonomous decision-making over industries, and it does not invent brand-new technologies without human engineers guiding and validating everything.
These videos mix extreme hypotheticals with apocalyptic storytelling to generate views, not facts.
The reality: AI accelerates workflows, it doesn’t wipe out the job market; and there is no technical basis for claims that an “uncontrollable AI” is coming in 2045. Look at scientific sources, not sci-fi narratives used to scare the audience.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-12-01T11:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxkgnULLYmW2gO5PJB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1cIDNjbhY-9qKV-x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzLD3V4wq8W03E6gC54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDHNlO6DSWm-Ap4ch4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAy0ZZUqf6bT7ccqV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzEPELXPm722gjg2aR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7Kt9pGNgBOcCv5ZV4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz5QKiOi8x1YY41nJt4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTgBP88pqrimUJint4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr-EWNqCNno6bb4RZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]