Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
You need to understand
Stable diffusion still needs an actual video to run on …
ytc_Ugz8UtIXa…
G
The day Ai can cry over the beauty of a sunset , have butterflies when it sees t…
ytc_Ugyr2D35e…
G
A victim would be the end customers, if Walmart freight costs went up 50% becaus…
ytr_UgwRJ9OFe…
G
Here is the certificate from my memory:
**Certificate of Assurance**
**This ce…
ytr_UgzIsNAhz…
G
So when everyone is out of work because automation,who will buy the product.Thes…
ytc_UgwTlBKVp…
G
@41-Haiku Being dead implies that AI can be alive or has a sense of self-preserv…
ytr_UgzNj7Loa…
G
Maybe we're looking it it wrong... Maybe AI's most effectiveness could be in f…
ytc_Ugy8xzTXb…
G
I'm really disappointed at all of these people who are defending AI and even ins…
ytc_Ugx0IHnlB…
Comment
I’ve found the best AI’s (sonnet 4.5 etc) is actually useful and doesn’t just churn out stuff that isn’t thought through and will cause many issues later. However, this is only because I give it a very strict set of requests that I only know from being a dev for 25+ years. I make sure it only handles a small function at a time and that function is testable. If you give it too much freedom then it makes mistakes. The problem is that the mistakes don’t look like mistakes as the syntax is correct and it mostly runs; the mistakes are things that it doesn’t know even from a massive context; eg: this with system will fail if x,y or z happens. But as it passes tests currently, the AI confidently reports “finished”.
I still think of it as a very eager young geek - knows it stuff but is miles too confident and makes mistakes as it is rushing just like an overly confident junior. Some day this may change but I don’t think the current LLM approach will solve this fully unless it is very tuned to “think” properly.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-12-29T10:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyShVCiFohFbAuxHbF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyGKKhCNWKpWmE0QwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxWlY8wKwlC3IVD67p4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzjN5oB7JY8AksUHH94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy5UMPycm4SjvWi_mZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw5HiA2Fy0j6lNiMAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGUE3QM4188oI13jB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz417YVrvH0_gMyDE94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3dMe7Z1hyMM1JIEx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpF70ghTL3Lsr47EV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]