Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
AI is a damn scam for corporations to inflate valuations and for billionaires to…
ytc_Ugz7If8lj…
G
It’s funny how this “person” justifies their actions with that tired old argumen…
ytc_UgztxrQX9…
G
Shout out the "what is my purpose" butter passing robot from Rick and Morty at t…
ytc_Uggi6_Zio…
G
"Robot goes Crazy after Programmer talks about his Mother" is what the title sho…
ytc_UgwuggFrC…
G
Knowing there are people able to draw with their mouths, no arms involved, havin…
ytc_UgxNl4xPW…
G
Gabriela Montemor Not in the slightest, in fact, somewhat on the contrary. I hav…
ytr_UgxbgUoUJ…
G
@Izunno_Sunnysixe mine are literally just bsd characters mostly (I haven't chatt…
ytr_Ugw1hBkIy…
G
This is not about the public seeing it. This is about your work being used to tr…
ytr_UgyehQTZS…
Comment
I think Alex might want to study philosophy of mind and analytical philosophy to a greater extent to make future discussions with AI more appealing. This felt more superficial than it could have been. For example, reading Searle more closely would make much of these questions for Chat GPT defunct. For example, understanding that Chat GPT utilises sintax, not semantics. My phone doesnt need to know what an app is in order to initiate a program. Humans do this as well, but also utilise a Higher Order Thinking faculty, particularly when it comes to reflecting on meaning and value. We also have sesory experience which informs our reality, another factor which severely limits the insight this video seems to be claiming.
I finished the video - when Alex askes the AI to only respond in Yes and No, he reduces the dialogue to a binary. Its the tail wagging the dog when he tries to have a conversation about consciousness using fallacies suxh as false dichotomy and reductio absurdum.
Enjoyable nevertheless
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-07-30T12:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxchB7J0p0B011_ucZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwIpmZMRNXNfZPaqGp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwy3COYfHSl9uA-u-F4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsv4bsl3FBkT4Tp7J4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx13hLZ9p51Ec72vsB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxdELNJdLE5jvrv-IB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIrhq-Gf0KF0h98C54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"amusement"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyxPpWHwZ4V-u7Ljnd4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxe2aYoDMTG9r665k14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVjewGyPHD4vLYniN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]