Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Consciousness is what makes the difference. We want the programmers conscious i…
ytc_UgyIpY-WI…
G
Misuse of AI started in India ... Be aware and careful. Goverment to ensure str…
ytc_Ugzzphw_W…
G
In argument, if everyone used AI it would be far too difficult to understand or …
ytc_UgyRuHflV…
G
Not equivalent at all. The calculator was equivalent to IDEs with built in debug…
ytc_Ugw2tqR9c…
G
lol skill issue, the more you people cry about AI the more I am going to support…
ytc_UgzCuUSnG…
G
This is stupid, AI detectors are unreliable and incredibly flawed. Some people j…
ytc_UgyZ8r5Uk…
G
how are you guys actually not seeing how overpowered gpt4 already is. Its like a…
ytr_Ugzj2Y2Wr…
G
Exactly - it's all about the copyright and the "cheating" against traditional ar…
ytc_UgwPEXZXy…
Comment
While I do fully support artists protecting their art against theft in this way, I'm not so much on board with the "Bad AI" take. Imho AI is not some supervillain trying to replace art or anything, it's just a tool. Tools themselves are neither good nor bad, how they are used by people makes the difference. Yes, it's absolute bullshit that AI companies crawl art without permission. That definitely needs to end, better sooner than later. But being able to generate pictures, e.g. for reference or to get a feeling for a certain design style that might interest me is a good thing I think, IF the training data is sourced ethically by either only using art that is specifically licensed for free use and rearrangement, OR by paying artists revenue for every time their work gets used (with their permission of course).
So tl;dr: Poisoning your art so that people can't replicate your style with AI? Hell yeah, go nuts. AI in general is bad? Nah, not really. Just needs proper use.
BTW: Amazing art, I love it <3
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-10-25T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | virtue |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwMvXuIW3J5vZmUhkR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzottNZP6A-nsr4DPl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_Imc0-ts2CGWpEWR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzflp2Hhb9It6_s8Dh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugymguu9b6FNLY7BaF94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx5yi_XXq3Tf8POngV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwSLtOEj3R1BAM8doN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEE-baQgBMxsaG1rJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAZXu25EPvoAzU8Ml4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxpUCIc4t833jX3Cnl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]