Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Hey there! It's interesting to hear your thoughts on the human-like appearance o…
ytr_UgwIfHnjS…
G
I saw a video about a porn site for little children to deepfake, absolutely disg…
ytr_UgwJ_jBSe…
G
My favorite part is that AI generations will reach a singularity where the progr…
ytc_Ugyb1X7y8…
G
Nanowrimo taking this stance is crazy considering how much writers in the commun…
ytc_Ugy-4Pppv…
G
I was just watching an interview with Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, …
ytr_Ugwau8Mty…
G
You could tax AI products based on the number of jobs it replaces and use the ta…
ytc_Ugwb_8gP8…
G
Everyone is terrified lol
Literally everyone because people who benefit from AI …
ytr_UgwDJ8vbN…
G
I also would like to mention so nobody gets it twisted, generative AI on its own…
ytr_Ugz-bLH17…
Comment
I respectfully disagree with the idea of forcing a 32 hour work week on everyone just because AI might boost productivity. Not every company is gonna jump on the AI train(or get the same big gains from it) so why push it across the board. Stuff like reducing hours should be up to the folks involved like employers and what consumers or workers actually want.
Forcing companies to give workers at least 45% control sounds off too. Most people dont know(or care much) about making smart business calls. Unpopular opinion but layoffs are sometimes needed for a company to stay afloat and I just don't see a worker heavy board making that play.
What I do agree with is making it easier for employees to own stock in their companies whether public or private. Share values have blown up like crazy these last years which is why the rich keep getting richer(mostly paid in equity) while wages lag behind. With manual jobs losing value fast I see ownership shooting up even more in the coming years. This could be our last shot to close that huge wealth gap.
- unemployed scroller
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-09T19:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxVr7YkIs1Amh6Id9h4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPXz3yiSjiFCNfMPR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzaEDW3lCzasEmeVVx4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUJS4yy4jnxkRBe094AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyTSL8zf7nyEJaPvRR4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyfj-PwN1JAZOrBwUJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyy5Gqr3bw_QZZNINJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwRj5KvpgkkQxSCtcZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3KflwSzmRkqDe7yR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwN8Mn8LkxVtp4Z7WV4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]