Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G The biggest flex someone can have is doing it with a very close friend instead o… ytc_Ugya1GiWW… G We don't understand fully what consciousness is. Once we get a fully mapped and … ytc_UgynP6L4U… G HAHA! 50%? its 110% those who think AI will bring immortally (the entire reason … ytc_UgzD1Ybye… G That's an interesting take! Sophia does have a unique personality that might rem… ytr_Ugwgqro34… G AI and automation should be used to make boring, repetitive and potentially dama… ytc_UgximTnQd… G We're glad you found Sophia fascinating! If you have more questions or want to d… ytr_UgzxKieIf… G Machines don't have a point of view, they just repeat what they're told to repea… ytc_Ugxb-sTO0… G I'm learning CS50P now and will end next month, after that, should I learn this … ytc_Ugwei4Tjy…
Comment
Mike said here exactly what I've been saying these past few months - if the current bulk of writers are worried about AI taking their jobs, it's clear that the output of these writers is reasonably replaceable by AI, regardless of the nascent state of the AI in question doing the replacing. I'm a software programmer and machine learning was part of my curriculum for my bachelor's in computer science, so I know a bit about how the sausage is made. It's one thing to use AI as an auxiliary tool to help writing if the overwhelming majority of the creative portion of the writing is done by a human, but as a recent Valliant Renegade video showed it's clear that writers think AI is good enough to start doing more of the writing _and_ studios think AI is nearly good enough to start replacing a number of humans in the writing room. Can't say current AI deepfaking is good enough to outright replace humans on the acting side yet, though, but that might be more a "resource budget" issue than an "actor's performance" issue at this point.
youtube AI Jobs 2023-08-30T04:5… ♥ 5
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilityunclear
Reasoningunclear
Policyunclear
Emotionunclear
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugy5R7z9GeRDWiKTUi54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzic3KCxJMkq0mv-bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyw5hywbBBFIDEWpLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxbS6wuGIIl4012pA94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx7zpX61MCaRzxhCB54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzcpHCNfnH_N7AoXSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})