Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The thing is that trying to bring in awareness and failsafes now that try and co…
ytc_Ugw5Tzyu4…
G
You do realize many AI models are run locally on the computer with no interferen…
ytr_UgxGusIZj…
G
I couldn’t agree less that a camera isn’t to painting what ai is to artistry.
…
ytc_Ugwz4gPL8…
G
This interview is eureka moment for me...such hype around AI as if it is a silve…
ytc_UgxeXNrUA…
G
This videos really opened up the new scenario of how to make the algorithm for s…
ytc_Ugi6wxkU3…
G
The AI chat bot only thought of those uses for pencils because some other human …
ytc_UgyDIZXu9…
G
Regardless of the list of benefits I will never be convinced AI is the answer. W…
ytc_Ugwb3xo_H…
G
this is just complex machine learning. AI is not even close to being conscious w…
ytc_UgxYhIrHt…
Comment
Mike said here exactly what I've been saying these past few months - if the current bulk of writers are worried about AI taking their jobs, it's clear that the output of these writers is reasonably replaceable by AI, regardless of the nascent state of the AI in question doing the replacing. I'm a software programmer and machine learning was part of my curriculum for my bachelor's in computer science, so I know a bit about how the sausage is made. It's one thing to use AI as an auxiliary tool to help writing if the overwhelming majority of the creative portion of the writing is done by a human, but as a recent Valliant Renegade video showed it's clear that writers think AI is good enough to start doing more of the writing _and_ studios think AI is nearly good enough to start replacing a number of humans in the writing room. Can't say current AI deepfaking is good enough to outright replace humans on the acting side yet, though, but that might be more a "resource budget" issue than an "actor's performance" issue at this point.
youtube
AI Jobs
2023-08-30T04:5…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugy5R7z9GeRDWiKTUi54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzic3KCxJMkq0mv-bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw5hywbBBFIDEWpLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbS6wuGIIl4012pA94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7zpX61MCaRzxhCB54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcpHCNfnH_N7AoXSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})