Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Which is exactly what AI is, just a tool. It doesn’t matter wether or not it’s s…
ytr_Ugx25vAj_…
G
> Do you understand that a virus does not care about your patent?
part of th…
rdc_grs6xzb
G
I ask "pulic right of way meaning"
Gemini seem tried to answer first and then sh…
ytc_Ugwtno6VF…
G
Soon, across the globe, we will be discussing the selling of sex robots, whether…
ytc_Ugz6-mapK…
G
From where I sit folk who came along and commercialised youtube to a TV-emulatin…
ytc_UgxsgBZik…
G
all these conversations about ai lack the fact that we will see massive climate …
ytc_Ugyw1lSPd…
G
Also, and this is worth repeating... maybe going the "everyone has to own a car"…
ytc_UgwqPEL_4…
G
@benb3316This long on a message and you still somehow make less sense.
Art styl…
ytr_Ugw1fb_tP…
Comment
Mike said here exactly what I've been saying these past few months - if the current bulk of writers are worried about AI taking their jobs, it's clear that the output of these writers is reasonably replaceable by AI, regardless of the nascent state of the AI in question doing the replacing. I'm a software programmer and machine learning was part of my curriculum for my bachelor's in computer science, so I know a bit about how the sausage is made. It's one thing to use AI as an auxiliary tool to help writing if the overwhelming majority of the creative portion of the writing is done by a human, but as a recent Valliant Renegade video showed it's clear that writers think AI is good enough to start doing more of the writing _and_ studios think AI is nearly good enough to start replacing a number of humans in the writing room. Can't say current AI deepfaking is good enough to outright replace humans on the acting side yet, though, but that might be more a "resource budget" issue than an "actor's performance" issue at this point.
youtube
AI Jobs
2023-08-30T04:5…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugy5R7z9GeRDWiKTUi54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzic3KCxJMkq0mv-bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw5hywbBBFIDEWpLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbS6wuGIIl4012pA94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7zpX61MCaRzxhCB54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcpHCNfnH_N7AoXSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})