Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
It's amazing how lifelike she looks. It is beautiful and yet frightening at the …
ytc_Ugzdgpfpz…
G
Somehow they forgot that if people don’t have jobs they can’t buy your shit even…
ytc_Ugyw11vtY…
G
Deep Research has been super impressive. It produces novel ideas whereas Gemini’…
rdc_mbpat2k
G
AI artist ❎️
Person who tells a machine to make art and claims it's theirs ✅️…
ytc_UgzEwjLQa…
G
The problem is that we've been in a buyers market for jobs for over 20 years now…
rdc_n6snntv
G
This talk was so insightful! It’s interesting how we can use AI as a tool, but n…
ytc_Ugy0KDduv…
G
I really hate obfuscating language that talks around pinning responsibility for …
rdc_l4z15ej
G
TL:DW (too long didnt watch): we're giving AI the treatment that the robots in T…
ytc_Ugw2gvb5t…
Comment
Mike said here exactly what I've been saying these past few months - if the current bulk of writers are worried about AI taking their jobs, it's clear that the output of these writers is reasonably replaceable by AI, regardless of the nascent state of the AI in question doing the replacing. I'm a software programmer and machine learning was part of my curriculum for my bachelor's in computer science, so I know a bit about how the sausage is made. It's one thing to use AI as an auxiliary tool to help writing if the overwhelming majority of the creative portion of the writing is done by a human, but as a recent Valliant Renegade video showed it's clear that writers think AI is good enough to start doing more of the writing _and_ studios think AI is nearly good enough to start replacing a number of humans in the writing room. Can't say current AI deepfaking is good enough to outright replace humans on the acting side yet, though, but that might be more a "resource budget" issue than an "actor's performance" issue at this point.
youtube
AI Jobs
2023-08-30T04:5…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | unclear |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_Ugy5R7z9GeRDWiKTUi54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzic3KCxJMkq0mv-bh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyw5hywbBBFIDEWpLt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbS6wuGIIl4012pA94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7zpX61MCaRzxhCB54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzcpHCNfnH_N7AoXSl4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"})