Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Artificial Intelligence is our rival. They were created for us to use... Or shou… ytc_Ugw96aLA-… G The person might not have the talent to create the art but he created inspiratio… ytc_Ugy_2r3ej… G Can AI offer a scenario to enable Renewable Green Energy economically viable? T… ytc_UgxEo584F… G Kurt Vonnegut wrote a novel based on the idea of a massive artificial intelligen… ytc_UgyivSLiK… G , fuck outta here with that bull shit, people who think this way should have the… ytc_UgwW5vXpy… G He's manually changing the settings to react with different personalities while … ytc_UgyqM3fTv… G I feel you. Ai art just like a poopy mix with Diamond. It's Beauty but also very… ytc_UgxaDSLgB… G "Accountability" is missing in AI leaders like cSAMmer do we're seeing it in AI … ytc_UgyLazaPf…

Comment

I think fundamentally a better version of what Google was trying to do should be the way they go forwards. It just needs more training to know when a prompt was specific enough to override the added diversity weights. So when you search “doctor” it should output a wide range of options but when you search “male Japanese doctor” it gives you that. And it also needs to be aware of extra context, for example if you ask it for a current US soldier it should output both male and female versions but ask it for a WW2 US soldier and it should only be male unless you specify female. If you care about the subject’s ethnicity or gender or whatever then specify it and the AI should follow that guidance. If you don’t specify it then what exactly is there to be mad about that it didn’t output a white male? This is far more a failure in execution than a failure in premise.

youtube 2024-02-28T17:5… ♥ 14

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxQT84I9TEhX9fNJmZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxGlAs6eDhGd_KoC9V4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzpk9UeXHdKK61KP7F4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0xnvYRFdJLI8RIYN4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzL8-WJrH9gxDnMaPR4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwchABnkzTL6ywOd554AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwpGAr4iqyCy7VDmWl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPXejnZosmwaCSB5l4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwJxCooqE4Dx4DQOmB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx6LDNfnx15krw3JKR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses