Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That's such an awful argument, lol. Digital art still requires a human to draw i…
ytc_Ugwg6DyrM…
G
How about Bus Drivers transporting anywhere from 1 to 106 passengers at one time…
ytc_UgzDJ4JQR…
G
I would hate to live in the country that decides not to do AI and then be wiped …
ytc_UgzL_pXti…
G
Chatgpt cant watch you ,,it just a text engine , that does pictures , learn abou…
ytc_UgyX-ESI3…
G
AI might have the capabilities to replace a lot of jobs for fraction of the cost…
ytc_UgzAUD39I…
G
Holy shit people stop & read this…
Humanity is going to be able to build a robo…
ytc_UgyltAekn…
G
@jacobcox4565
When i worked there it was 12 hours actually. With about an hou…
ytr_UgwpOisg2…
G
My issue with it is, if senior people are overseeing the AI as it replaces all t…
rdc_n7ybvz3
Comment
One of the issues I experienced when I did a 95%+ LLM code generated frontend (typescript, react, tailwindcss) was that the tailwind css classes was basically "inlined" everywhere in the project and while it looked good at first, eventually as the project scaled it would've been a disaster everytime you wanted to change design/color, because you'd have to track where you'd need to change.
And while the LLM is good at traversing lots of text the context will eventually be too big.
Eventually I had to refactor the codebase and I added some rules and it helped a lot, but it still added "inline" tailwind css classes even though it isn't allowed to do so.
What's the point with all of this; well it is that it's not actually intelligent (like you said in this video too) because if it was it wouldn't keep ignoring the rules. Yes the developer can ignore those kind of rules as well but eventually they'd have to learn whereas the LLM doesn't.
I actually try to steer away from calling it "AI" and stick to "LLM" because it's not actually intelligent.
youtube
AI Jobs
2026-01-23T11:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwVkkSfpHzqdRC8IQh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxESdUc0bBM6fVYRGt4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuGZTckK001Cowamp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyF0c4FwmZ-KGU29cx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzeXa1EBQRbPGSy-qN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyB5gQXOdDeQa2GDqF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxcNLAf3Zsxwo237aZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwYyPiG3GMzZxf_HzN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3fLYH__kcDTwP2xF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy4Wx39RhgRl63gS3h4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]