Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
GPT: "“Until there is unmistakable participatory evidence — not linguistic, not …
ytc_UgwNGHF7I…
G
Wear very large dark sunglasses of different shapes, a goofy large odd shaped ha…
ytc_UgzB0hWsF…
G
As for AI generating code with vulnerabilities - that’s a fact. Just recently, C…
ytr_Ugzv4Wtka…
G
1:06 ChatGPT says “umm” and for some reason that is cool to me, it’s like its th…
ytc_UgzbwdA5O…
G
Actually, no. You shouldn't thank AI for the responses it gives you. When you re…
ytc_Ugx0hxwpv…
G
Well ... AI cannot correct itself, because it cannot know meaning and therefore …
ytc_UgwkmE8el…
G
We all know that we face adversaries ai bots in a shooting game. Should ai not b…
ytc_UgxKbMbPT…
G
We people are lazy and thats normal. I hate to say it but we already are terribl…
ytc_UgyiqngKq…
Comment
17:32 I’ve had counter points to all the stuff this guy has said, but this was wild. The assertion was made that things that were referred to as miracles at that time are easily explainable now. How on earth do you think a valid rebuttal is saying well there’s still things that are unexplainable today? Have you never heard of the god of the gaps theory? To sum it up, religion is basically a placeholder for science. It only claims to give answers to what is unanswered by science, once science answers that.. religion takes another step to whatever is still unanswered.
I dont know if this video will attract many folks of the same belief system I hold, I’d probably be considered atheist by your crowd but I’d technically qualify myself as agnostic. In my opinion, this ChatGPT thing presented challenging topics, but didn’t challenge your responses. I dont know why it did that but it was odd that you seemed to take the lack of pushback as validation of your opinion. I’d be interested in watching you talk through these same points but let a non believer who works in the field of science debate you.
youtube
2024-10-15T05:3…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgysPzEO5WVHWrX6FxZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwumo5LYWriMTtA-s94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxHHvF-I5kzZtoLNF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxIuGlrSK9ikoLwedB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ceFHeoZZJRzp_GZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7WB3JGpo2az7eSuN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"confusion"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwV0sgbJ7Wh9DzTLX14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtJmdJjM7mesibu_N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgypTTFmpaIXFphTP-d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx3ik1dVemgvxJguvJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]