Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Is there an age limit to enter AI and DS jobs in MNC? I am in my early 30s…
ytc_UgxXVll1i…
G
People are earning massive money in trades building out AI infrastructure that A…
ytc_Ugy_k3y9k…
G
Human Greed is going to kill us. The Human race is killing each other ONE RACE. …
ytc_UgwntpX6z…
G
I am hopeful ai will steer us towards complete human connection… but only at the…
ytc_UgyAPOe4P…
G
What a bafoon. Your AI technology is not precise and has killed many innocents c…
ytc_UgwIO_dIr…
G
I seriously don’t get the argument some ai promoters say when it “democracies” a…
ytc_UgzpFO6EV…
G
Literally United HC uses AI to innapropriately deny claims.
Also (allegedly) to…
rdc_oi46jd4
G
Don't let your petty morality get in the way of technological advancement. If yo…
ytc_UgyprSaaa…
Comment
The thing where they trained GPT-4o on code with vulnerabilities was actually reassuring to Eliezer Yudkowsky.
In order to know what good behavior looks like, the model also needs to know what bad behavior looks like. Insecure code gets punished in the same way as hatespeech, so when you then make the model produce insecure code, the easiest way for the optimizer to achieve that is to simply make the model evil. The reassuring part was that this meant that behavior was tied to values pretty much across the board if changing it in one area can flip its behavior fully, indicating higher robustness to the process of RLHF than previously thought.
It's really not all that surprising. Though I think the implications aren't all that meaningful apart from it being surprisingly easy to mess up parts of a model ones data had absolutely nothing to do with.
Anyhow, it's less "revealing the models true self" than "making the model care about the exact opposite of what it did originally".
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-12-12T21:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[{"id":"ytc_UgwoPeMsVfJVfD235KZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNgiTXKTnsd9KAIXl4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwILvn9vSF1VnlIrMl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwUF9z1CW4NnDWTr5J4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUI84MwRB5WxUznB94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz6rAfqZWNYf9BjA7h4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwT_4ubTRVoQOykPBx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSY4WVINPbp-ZQjEF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyC2u9XjF6TYZxJNk14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxr1DWydj_B4gaXQmJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}]