Raw LLM Responses

General public seems to do mostly waifus with big boobs with these tools, no offense to artists of culture. I don’t think that majority of these folks would ever make a commission from artist. In terms of value of a human art, I think that it will only rise. I would appreciate a print from real artists more than any generated content because it has so much more value. Someone spend decades of their life on learning and then spend a couple of days or a week to draw something that you can appreciate. Raw machine outputs is just: here, it’s done, hundreds of times, good luck searching for the best one. There no scarcity in AI art. Drawing is a craft, a long term commitment, it’s a discipline which is hard to master. But nevertheless I still can see how these neural tools can be not disruptive but empowering. You can explore new concepts, experiment with ideas, and be creative with it. And with a development in other tech fields we will be doing stuff that we for now can’t even imagine. It’s not the end, but a start. Let’s keep it. For those users who will intentionally use AI to restyle others works for a reselling, please remember that there is a law against art forgery. To sum up: I believe that we can collectively find a common ground and decide what rules should be applied for the use of this technology and training process. It’s a complicated topic and we need a discussion which wouldn’t be easy one.